Sharp Aquos Zero 2 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a modern software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is the better choice. However, users seeking a more compact form factor and potentially higher peak performance in short bursts may find the Aquos Zero 2 appealing, despite its age and charging limitations.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos Zero 2 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 41 - Taiwan | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 22. Released 2020, May 22 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.22 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 141 g (4.97 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 20 MP, f/2.4, 125˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired, PD2.0 | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3130 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | SH-Z20, SHV47, 906SH | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 670 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos Zero 2
- Compact and lightweight design
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance (Snapdragon 855)
- Likely faster RAM (LPDDR5)
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 855)
- Unknown battery capacity and charging speed
- Potentially outdated software and security updates
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent battery life (11:15h active use)
- Brighter display (980 nits)
- Modern software and security updates
- Larger and heavier form factor
- Less powerful chipset (Exynos 1380) in raw CPU terms
- Potentially slower RAM (LPDDR4x)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 980 nits, compared to an unknown peak brightness for the Aquos Zero 2. While the Aquos Zero 2 likely has excellent color accuracy given Sharp’s display expertise, the A54’s higher brightness ensures better visibility outdoors. The A54’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical OLED panel, while the Aquos Zero 2’s panel type isn’t specified, but was likely also OLED given the era. Bezels are likely slimmer on the older Aquos Zero 2 due to its smaller size.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Aquos Zero 2. The Galaxy A54 likely features a more versatile camera system with advanced image processing algorithms. The A54’s camera likely benefits from Samsung’s extensive software optimizations. Without specific sensor details for the Aquos Zero 2, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A54 is unlikely to be a significant benefit, as image quality is often limited by the small sensor size.
Performance
The Aquos Zero 2’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) was a flagship processor in its time, featuring an octa-core configuration with a peak clock speed of 2.84 GHz. However, the Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380 (5nm) benefits from a more modern manufacturing process. The 5nm node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, meaning the Exynos 1380 can deliver comparable, and in some cases, superior sustained performance with less thermal throttling. While the Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores offer strong single-core performance, the Exynos 1380’s Cortex-A78 cores are architecturally more efficient. The A54’s RAM configuration (not specified in context) is likely LPDDR4x, while the Aquos Zero 2 likely used LPDDR5, potentially giving it a slight memory bandwidth advantage.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 clearly excels in battery life, achieving an impressive 11:15h of active use and an endurance rating of 119h. The Aquos Zero 2’s battery capacity is unknown, but given its age and focus on a compact form factor, it’s likely smaller. The A54 supports 25W wired charging, while the Aquos Zero 2 utilizes PD2.0, but its wattage is unspecified. The Exynos 1380’s 5nm process contributes to the A54’s superior battery efficiency, allowing it to deliver significantly longer runtimes.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos Zero 2 if you need a smaller, lighter phone and prioritize raw CPU performance for tasks like quick app launches and light gaming, and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life and slower charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a larger display, all-day battery life (11:15h active use), a more refined camera system, and the latest software updates with guaranteed security patches.