The Sharp Aquos Xx and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge were both flagship contenders in their time, boasting impressive features. But how do they stack up against each other today? We'll dive deep into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you decide which phone is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge decisively wins this comparison. While the Aquos Xx had a unique design, the S7 edge’s superior chipset, camera, and battery life, combined with its refined software, make it the more compelling choice even years later.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 - G935FD, G9350 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - G935F, G935FD, G935W8 |
| 4G bands | LTE 900 / 1700 / 2100 / 2500 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G935F, G935FD |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, May. Released 2015, July | 2016, February 21. Released 2016, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), glass back (Gorilla Glass 4), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 146 x 79 x 8.7 mm (5.75 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) | 150.9 x 72.6 x 7.7 mm (5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM (G935F, G935W8)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (G935FD) |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 157 g (5.54 oz) |
| | Splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 89.6 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | S-PureLED | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A57) | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) - G9350Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Mongoose & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) - G935FD, G935F, G935W8 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) - G9350Exynos 8890 Octa (14 nm) - G935FD, G935F, G935W8 |
| GPU | Adreno 430 | Adreno 530 - G9350Mali-T880 MP12 - G935FD, G935F, G935W8 |
| OS | Android 5.0 (Lollipop) | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo), TouchWiz UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps, 480p@210fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR, stereo sound rec., OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 2.1 MP | 5 MP, f/1.7, 22mm (wide), 1/4.1", 1.34µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | Direct Wave Receiver
| - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired, QC2
Wireless (Qi) (market dependent) |
| Music play | - | Up to 74 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | Up to 27 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red | Black, White, Gold, Silver, Pink Gold, Black Pearl, Coral Blue |
| Models | 304SH, 404SH | SM-G935F, SM-G935FD, SM-G935W8, SM-G9350, SM-G935S, SC-02H, SM-G935K, SM-G935L, SM-G935R4, SCV33, SM-G935X, SM-G935VC, SM-G935D |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.66 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.26 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -92.5dB / Crosstalk -92.2dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 92h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.439 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 70dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 71dB
|
| Performance | - |
GFXBench: 8.3fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos Xx
- Unique minimalist design
- Compact size
- Decent display
- Outdated chipset
- Lower performance
- Limited availability
- Less impressive camera
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
- Powerful chipset
- Excellent camera
- Long battery life
- Curved display
- Wide availability
- Older software
- Potential battery degradation (due to age)
Display Comparison
Both phones featured excellent displays for their time. The S7 edge's curved display offered a more immersive experience and a modern aesthetic. The Aquos Xx prioritized a flat, minimalist design. Both achieved impressive sunlight readability with a contrast ratio of 4.439.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy S7 edge's camera was a standout feature, consistently praised for its image quality, low-light performance, and versatility. While the Aquos Xx had a decent camera, it couldn't compete with the S7 edge's superior optics and image processing capabilities.
Performance
The Galaxy S7 edge holds a significant advantage here. Its Snapdragon 820 (or Exynos 8890) chipset is considerably more powerful and efficient than the Aquos Xx's Snapdragon 810. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better overall performance. The Aquos Xx's Snapdragon 810 was known to suffer from thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Galaxy S7 edge boasts an impressive endurance rating of 92 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While specific battery capacity for the Aquos Xx is harder to find, it's generally accepted that the S7 edge offered longer battery life.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Sharp Aquos Xx? Likely only enthusiasts seeking a rare and unique device with a focus on a minimalist design. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge? Anyone looking for a reliable, capable, and still-performing Android phone with a great camera and battery life, especially at a budget price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Sharp Aquos Xx still worth buying?
Only if you're a collector or appreciate its unique design. Its performance is significantly outdated.
❓ Can I still find a Samsung Galaxy S7 edge?
Yes, but be mindful of battery health. Look for a well-maintained used device.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Galaxy S7 edge, despite being older, received more updates and has a larger community for custom ROMs.