The smartphone market is brimming with options, especially in the budget-friendly range. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Sharp Aquos Xx and the BLU Life One X (2016). Both aim to deliver value, but which one truly comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sharp Aquos Xx boasts a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 810 chipset, offering noticeably better performance. While the BLU Life One X (2016) might offer slightly longer battery life in some scenarios, the Aquos Xx's superior processing power makes it the clear winner for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE 900 / 1700 / 2100 / 2500 | 2, 4, 7, 12, 17 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, May. Released 2015, July | 2015, December. Released 2015, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 146 x 79 x 8.7 mm (5.75 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) | 149.5 x 73.6 x 8.6 mm (5.89 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) |
| Keyboard | - | QWERTY |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 141 g (4.97 oz) |
| | Splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 89.6 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~67.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | S-PureLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A57) | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm) | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 430 | Mali-T720MP3 |
| OS | Android 5.0 (Lollipop) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), upgradаble to 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM |
| Phonebook | - | 1000 entries, Photocall |
| | eMMC 5.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps, 480p@210fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 2.1 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | Direct Wave Receiver
| - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | WAP 2.0/xHTML |
| Games | - | Yes |
| Java | - | Yes, MIDP 2.0 |
| Messaging | - | SMS, MMS |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 450 h (3G) | Up to 725 h (2G) / Up to 625 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 22 h 30 min (3G) | Up to 24 h (2G) / Up to 15 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2900 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red | Black, White |
| Models | 304SH, 404SH | - |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
Sharp Aquos Xx
- Significantly faster performance
- Likely better display quality
- Potentially better camera
- Premium feel (typical of Sharp devices)
- Potential thermal throttling with Snapdragon 810
- Smaller battery capacity
- May be harder to find/support
BLU Life One X (2016)
- Large battery capacity
- Very affordable price
- Widely available
- Slow performance
- Lower display resolution
- Mediocre camera
- Less premium build quality
Display Comparison
The Sharp Aquos Xx likely featured a higher resolution display (likely 1080p or higher) and potentially better color accuracy compared to the BLU Life One X (2016), which probably had a standard 720p display. Sharp's reputation for display quality gives it an edge.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are difficult to confirm without detailed reviews, the Snapdragon 810 often paired with better camera sensors and image processing capabilities. The Aquos Xx likely produced sharper, more detailed photos, especially in low light. The BLU Life One X's camera was likely adequate but not exceptional.
Performance
This is where the Aquos Xx shines. The Snapdragon 810, despite its thermal issues, is considerably faster than the Mediatek MT6753. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the Aquos Xx. The BLU Life One X will feel sluggish by comparison.
Battery Life
The BLU Life One X (2016) was known for its large battery capacity (often 4000mAh or greater). While the Aquos Xx had a smaller battery, the more efficient chipset of the BLU Life One X could potentially result in slightly longer battery life under light usage. However, under heavy use, the Aquos Xx's power demands would likely drain the battery faster.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos Xx is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a smoother user experience, even on a budget. The BLU Life One X (2016) is a good choice for those primarily focused on battery life and a very affordable price point, accepting compromises in speed and overall power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 810 chipset reliable?
The Snapdragon 810 was known for thermal throttling issues, meaning it could overheat under sustained load. However, with proper cooling and usage, it can still deliver good performance.
❓ Where can I find replacement parts for these phones?
Finding replacement parts for older phones like these can be challenging. Online marketplaces like eBay are your best bet, but availability may be limited.
