Google Pixel 7a vs. Sharp Aquos wish4: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and unlocks advanced features like Magic Eraser, while its camera system is in a different league. However, the Aquos wish4 offers a compelling value proposition for those prioritizing battery life and a more affordable price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos wish4 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 29 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Video | Yes, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | SH-M27SG | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Sharp Aquos wish4
- Superior performance with Google Tensor G2
- Exceptional camera quality and features
- Faster charging and wireless charging support
- Higher price point
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Aquos wish4
Google Pixel 7a
- More affordable price
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Lacks advanced features like wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to an assumed lower peak brightness on the Aquos wish4 (typical of its price bracket). While the Aquos wish4’s panel specifications are not provided, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel offers superior contrast and color accuracy. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (not specified for the Aquos wish4) also contributes to a smoother user experience, particularly when scrolling through content. The Pixel 7a’s smaller bezels also contribute to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear standout. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in low-light photography and offers features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The Aquos wish4 likely relies more on hardware limitations, and while it may produce acceptable images in good lighting conditions, it won’t match the Pixel 7a’s dynamic range, detail, or overall versatility. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Sharp Aquos wish4’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.85 GHz, provides a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores, while capable, are less efficient and slower. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Pixel 7a will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating good battery life despite its powerful processor. It supports 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging. The Aquos wish4’s battery capacity is unknown, but its less demanding chipset and larger fabrication process (7nm vs 5nm) suggest potentially longer battery life on a single charge. However, the Pixel 7a’s faster charging speeds offer greater convenience, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Pixel 7a’s wireless charging capability is also a notable advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos wish4 if you need a reliable, long-lasting phone for basic tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse the web, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a premium camera experience, smooth performance for demanding apps, and access to Google’s latest software features and AI enhancements. It’s the better choice for content creators and power users.