Sharp Aquos Wish vs Sony Xperia 10 IV: A Budget 5G Showdown

The mid-range smartphone market is booming, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Sharp Aquos Wish and the Sony Xperia 10 IV. Both promise 5G connectivity and a decent experience, but which one delivers the best overall package?

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Sony Xperia 10 IV edges out the Aquos Wish thanks to its superior chipset, brighter display, and generally more refined software experience. While the Aquos Wish offers a competitive price, the Xperia 10 IV provides a more polished and reliable performance.

PHONES
Phone Names	Sharp Aquos wish	Sony Xperia 10 IV

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41	1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands	1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G

Launch
Announced	2022, January 19	2022, May 11
Status	Available. Released 2022, January 21	Available. Released 2022, June 30

Body
Build	Plastic body, plastic frame	Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	147 x 71 x 8.9 mm (5.79 x 2.80 x 0.35 in)	153 x 67 x 8.3 mm (6.02 x 2.64 x 0.33 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + eSIM	· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	162 g (5.71 oz)	161 g (5.68 oz)
	IPX5/IP6X/IPX7 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant	IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution	720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density)	1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~457 ppi density)
Size	5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio)	6.0 inches, 84.1 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD	OLED, 1B colors, HDR
	-	Triluminos display

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)	Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPU	Adreno 619	Adreno 619
OS	Android 11	Android 12, upgradable to Android 14

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	64GB 4GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM
	-	UFS

Main Camera
Features	LED flash	LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single	13 MP, (wide), AF	8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0"
Triple	-	12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0"
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Features	-	HDR
Single	8 MP	8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0"
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE	5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
NFC	Yes	Yes
Positioning	GPS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	-	21W wired (unofficial rating), PD, QC
Type	Li-Ion 3730 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Spring Bud Green, Foggy Black	Black, White, Mint, Lavender
Models	-	XQ-CC54, XQ-CC72, SOG07
Price	About 230 EUR	£ 99.99 / € 112.89

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 163h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-30.6 LUFS (Below average)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 396008 (v9) GeekBench: 1908 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Sharp Aquos wish

Affordable price
Clean Android experience
5G connectivity

Less powerful chipset
Dimmer display
Slower charging

Sony Xperia 10 IV

Brighter display
More powerful chipset
Excellent battery life
Faster charging

Slightly higher price
Design can feel a bit dated

Display Comparison

The Xperia 10 IV boasts a significantly brighter display at 683 nits (measured) compared to the Aquos Wish, offering better visibility in sunlight. While both have OLED panels, Sony's implementation appears more refined, with a reported infinite contrast ratio. The Aquos Wish's display is adequate but lacks the punch and vibrancy of the Xperia 10 IV.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable cameras, but the Xperia 10 IV likely holds a slight advantage due to Sony's established camera expertise. While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, the Xperia 10 IV's image processing and overall camera software are generally considered superior. Expect better low-light performance and more natural-looking colors from the Xperia 10 IV.

Performance

The Sony Xperia 10 IV's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Aquos Wish's Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience. The Xperia 10 IV's Kryo 660 Gold cores provide a performance boost.

Battery Life

The Xperia 10 IV shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 163 hours. This is a significant advantage over the Aquos Wish, which, while not terrible, doesn't match the Xperia 10 IV's longevity. The Xperia 10 IV also supports 21W wired charging (PD, QC), offering faster charging speeds.

Buying Guide

The Sharp Aquos Wish is ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing affordability and a clean Android experience. The Sony Xperia 10 IV is a better choice for those seeking a more powerful processor, a brighter display, and a slightly more premium feel, even within the budget category.