Sharp's Aquos wish and sense7 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range 5G smartphone market. The wish prioritizes affordability and 5G connectivity, while the sense7 aims for a more balanced experience with a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects the core differences between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 and 695, revealing which device delivers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Sharp Aquos sense7 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the wish’s Snapdragon 480, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While the wish offers 5G at a lower price point, the sense7’s improved processing power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 19 | 2023, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 21 | Available. Released 2023, September |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Plastic body, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 147 x 71 x 8.9 mm (5.79 x 2.80 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 70 x 8 mm (5.98 x 2.76 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 158 g (5.57 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX7 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810G compliant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 2432 pixels (~436 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 89.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IGZO OLED, 1B colors, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", dual pixel PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 15mm (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3730 mAh | Li-Ion 4570 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Spring Bud Green, Foggy Black | Black |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 380 EUR |
Sharp Aquos wish
- Most affordable 5G option
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Snapdragon 480 is less powerful
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Lower image processing capabilities
Sharp Aquos sense7
- More powerful Snapdragon 695
- Improved power efficiency
- Better image processing capabilities
- Higher price point
- May not be significantly faster for very basic tasks
- Still a mid-range device with limitations
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are unavailable, but given the market positioning, both likely utilize LCD panels. The key difference lies in the chipsets’ ability to drive the displays efficiently. The sense7’s Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, will likely offer better power efficiency when rendering graphics, potentially leading to slightly longer battery life during video playback. Bezels are expected to be comparable, reflecting the mid-range nature of both devices. Color accuracy is likely similar, with both targeting standard sRGB coverage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Snapdragon 695 in the sense7 includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) capable of faster image processing and improved noise reduction. This suggests the sense7 will likely produce higher-quality photos, especially in low-light conditions. The ISP’s capabilities also extend to video recording, potentially offering better stabilization and dynamic range. While both phones may feature similar megapixel counts, the sense7’s superior image processing pipeline will likely result in more detailed and visually appealing images.
Performance
The core distinction between these phones is the chipset. The Aquos wish features the Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm), an octa-core processor with 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460 cores. The sense7 boasts the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring a more powerful octa-core configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The 6nm process node of the 695 is significantly more efficient than the 8nm node of the 480, resulting in lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling under sustained load. This translates to a more consistent performance experience, particularly during gaming or demanding applications. The 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores also offer a performance advantage over the 480’s Kryo 460 cores.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing, but the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process offers a significant advantage in power efficiency. This means the sense7 will likely achieve longer battery life on a single charge, even with a similar battery capacity to the wish. The 695 also supports faster charging technologies, potentially reducing 0-100% charge times compared to the wish. The improved efficiency of the 695 will also reduce heat generation during charging, contributing to battery longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos wish if you absolutely need the lowest possible price for a 5G-enabled smartphone and your usage primarily involves basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing. Buy the Sharp Aquos sense7 if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks, occasional gaming, and appreciate the benefits of a more efficient chipset for improved battery life during moderate use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Aquos sense7 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, the 695's improved GPU and thermal management compared to the 480 in the wish will provide a more stable frame rate and less overheating during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 480 and 695 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Snapdragon 695 offers a snappier and more responsive experience when multitasking, opening apps, and scrolling through web pages. While the 480 is adequate for basic tasks, the 695 provides a smoother and more fluid user experience, reducing lag and stuttering.
❓ Does the Aquos sense7 support faster charging than the Aquos wish?
While specific charging wattage details are unavailable, the Snapdragon 695 generally supports faster charging protocols. This, combined with the chipset's improved power efficiency, suggests the sense7 will likely charge from 0-100% faster than the wish.
