Sharp Aquos Wish vs Samsung Galaxy S10e: A Clash of Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S10e offers significantly superior performance, a better camera, and a more premium feel despite its age. The Aquos Wish provides a compelling budget option with 5G connectivity, but falls short in overall quality and power. The S10e remains the stronger choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos wish | Samsung Galaxy S10e |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 19 | 2019, February 20. Released 2019, March 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 21 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic body, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 147 x 71 x 8.9 mm (5.79 x 2.80 x 0.35 in) | 142.2 x 69.9 x 7.9 mm (5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 150 g (5.29 oz) |
| IPX5/IP6X/IPX7 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~438 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.8 inches, 82.8 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA/LATAMOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Exynos 9820 (8 nm) - EMEA/LATAMQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/China |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA/LATAM Adreno 640 - USA/China |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, Super Steady video |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@60fps (no EIS), 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 10 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (USA & Canada only) |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | ANT+ Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired, PD2.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3730 mAh | Li-Ion 3100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Spring Bud Green, Foggy Black | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Green, Prism Blue, Canary Yellow, Flamingo Pink |
| Models | - | SM-G970F, SM-G970U, SM-G970W, SM-G9700, SM-G970U1, SM-G970N, SM-G970X |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -89.4dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: infinite |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 71dB / Noise 76dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 325192 (v7), 389694 (v8) GeekBench: 10081 (v4.4), 2141 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos wish
- Affordable price
- 5G connectivity
- Large display
- Decent battery life
- Lower performance
- Less impressive camera
- LCD display
- Slower charging
Samsung Galaxy S10e
- Powerful performance
- Excellent camera
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Compact design
- Fast charging
- Older model
- Battery life may degrade over time
- Limited software updates
Display Comparison
The Galaxy S10e boasts a vibrant AMOLED display with excellent color accuracy and deep blacks, offering an immersive viewing experience. The Aquos Wish likely features an LCD panel, which will be less vibrant and may have narrower viewing angles. While both claim 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), the S10e's AMOLED technology delivers a noticeably better visual experience.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy S10e's camera system is a clear winner. It offers better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. While the Aquos Wish's camera is serviceable, it lacks the sophistication and capabilities of the S10e. The S10e also offers more versatile shooting modes and features.
Performance
Here, the Galaxy S10e pulls ahead. Its Exynos 9820 or Snapdragon 855 chipset (depending on region) is significantly more powerful than the Aquos Wish's Snapdragon 480. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the S10e. The Aquos Wish will handle everyday tasks adequately, but may struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones are reported to have an endurance rating of 83h, which is impressive. However, the S10e's faster charging capabilities (15W wired, wireless, and reverse wireless) provide added convenience. The Aquos Wish's charging speed is likely slower, making it take longer to fully charge.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos Wish is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize 5G connectivity and a large display. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is perfect for those seeking a compact, powerful phone with a great camera and a premium design, even if it's a slightly older model.