The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Sharp Aquos Wish and the Samsung Galaxy A13. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the ultimate winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A13 edges out the Aquos Wish thanks to its more established brand reputation, slightly better battery life, and wider availability. While the Aquos Wish boasts a Snapdragon 480 5G, the A13's overall package provides a more reliable and feature-rich experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 19 | 2022, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 21 | Available. Released 2022, July |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Plastic body, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 147 x 71 x 8.9 mm (5.79 x 2.80 x 0.35 in) | 165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX7 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810G compliant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), AF | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3730 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Spring Bud Green, Foggy Black | Black, White, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A137F, SM-A137F/DSN, SM-A137F/DS |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) 1.22 W/kg (body) |
Sharp Aquos wish
- Compact and lightweight design
- 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for the price
- Sharp display
- Limited availability
- Less versatile camera system
- Smaller battery capacity
- Potentially less software support
Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)
- Larger display
- Versatile camera system
- Good battery life
- Widely available
- Established brand reputation
- Helio G80 chipset may feel slightly slower than Snapdragon 480
- 15W charging is relatively slow
- LCD display
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A13 features a larger 6.6-inch display, offering more screen real estate for media consumption and gaming. The Aquos Wish has a smaller, more pocketable 6.08-inch display. Both utilize LCD panels, so don't expect OLED-level vibrancy, but the A13's size advantage is noticeable.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A13 typically has a more versatile camera system, often including a higher-resolution main sensor and potentially an ultrawide lens. The Aquos Wish's camera performance is decent, but may lack the depth and features of the A13. Image quality in good lighting is comparable, but low-light performance favors the A13.
Performance
The Sharp Aquos Wish's Snapdragon 480 5G generally offers slightly better CPU performance than the Galaxy A13's Helio G80. However, real-world performance differences are often minimal, and both phones are suitable for everyday tasks. Gaming performance will be adequate on both, but don't expect high frame rates on demanding titles.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A13 generally offers better battery life due to its larger battery capacity and optimized power management. While the Aquos Wish's battery is adequate, the A13 will likely last longer on a single charge, especially with moderate to heavy usage.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos Wish is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and a compact design, particularly those in regions where it's readily available. The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a better choice for those seeking a dependable, widely supported device with a larger display and a more familiar Android experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better 5G speeds?
The Sharp Aquos Wish, with its Snapdragon 480 5G chipset, is theoretically capable of slightly faster 5G speeds, but real-world performance depends on network conditions.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A13 worth buying over other phones in the same price range?
The Galaxy A13 is a solid choice due to its reliable performance, good battery life, and wide availability. However, it's always worth comparing it to other options like the Xiaomi Redmi series or Motorola Moto G series to ensure you're getting the best value.
