Sharp Aquos Wish vs. Asus Zenfone 9: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Asus Zenfone 9 is the clear winner, offering significantly superior performance, a brighter display, and a more advanced camera system. While the Aquos Wish provides a more affordable entry point, the Zenfone 9's premium features justify its higher price for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos wish | Asus Zenfone 9 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 - A version |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 77, 78 - A version |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat20 2000/211 Mbps, 5G 4.5/0.9 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 - C version | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 19 | 2022, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 21 | Available. Released 2022, September 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic body, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 147 x 71 x 8.9 mm (5.79 x 2.80 x 0.35 in) | 146.5 x 68.1 x 9.1 mm (5.77 x 2.68 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| IPX5/IP6X/IPX7 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~445 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.9 inches, 84.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, gimbal OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 113° (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 12 MP, f/2.5, 28mm (standard), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, QC4 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3730 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Spring Bud Green, Foggy Black | Starry Blue, Moonlight White, Sunset Red, Midnight Black |
| Models | - | AI2202-1A006EU, AI2202, AI2202_B |
| Price | About 230 EUR | £ 619.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 108h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1083092 (v9) GeekBench: 4338 (v5.1) GFXBench: 89fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos wish
- Affordable
- 5G Connectivity
- Decent Battery Life (108h endurance)
- Lower Performance
- Less Bright Display
- Basic Camera System
- Missing Display Specs
Asus Zenfone 9
- High Performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Bright Display (831 nits)
- Excellent Camera
- Fast Charging (30W)
- Compact Size
- Higher Price
- Potentially Smaller Battery Capacity (though endurance is excellent)
Display Comparison
The Asus Zenfone 9 boasts a significantly brighter display at 831 nits (measured) compared to the Aquos Wish, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the Aquos Wish's display is adequate, the Zenfone 9's contrast ratio (infinite nominal) provides a more immersive viewing experience. The Zenfone 9 likely has a higher resolution as well, though specific details are missing for the Aquos Wish.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer photo and video capabilities, the Zenfone 9's camera system is expected to be far superior. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 includes a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), enabling better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are missing for both, but the Zenfone 9's hardware advantage is undeniable.
Performance
The Zenfone 9's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Aquos Wish's Snapdragon 480 5G. The Zenfone 9's CPU, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core, delivers significantly faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking. Gaming and demanding applications will perform noticeably better on the Zenfone 9.
Battery Life
Both phones are reported to have an endurance rating of 108 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Zenfone 9 also supports 30W wired charging and 5W reverse wired charging, offering faster charging speeds and the ability to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos Wish is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and basic smartphone functionality. The Asus Zenfone 9 is perfect for those seeking a compact, powerful phone with a top-tier camera and performance, willing to invest a bit more.