Sharp's Aquos line offers a diverse range of smartphones, but the R7s and V7 Plus represent distinct philosophies. The R7s aims for a near-flagship experience with a premium chipset, while the V7 Plus focuses on delivering a functional smartphone at a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Sharp Aquos R7s is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. However, the Aquos V7 Plus provides a compelling value proposition for everyday tasks and light gaming, making it ideal for budget-conscious consumers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July | 2023, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5 mm (6.61 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 161 x 77 x 9.3 mm (6.34 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1260 x 2730 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PRO IGZO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 47.2 MP, f/1.9, 19mm (ultrawide), 1.0"-type, dual pixel PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K, 4K, 1080p; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 12.6 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 27W wired, PD3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 5010 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Dark Blue | Black |
| Models | SH-C06 | SH-R70 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 1000 EUR |
Sharp Aquos V7 Plus
- More affordable price point
- Good efficiency for everyday tasks
- Reliable performance for basic use
- Significantly slower performance than the R7s
- Limited gaming capabilities
- Slower charging speed
Sharp Aquos R7s
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Faster 27W PD3 charging
- Likely superior camera capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- May offer limited battery life gains over V7 Plus due to power draw
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the R7s, positioned as a higher-tier device, likely features a superior panel. The V7 Plus, targeting a lower price bracket, probably utilizes a standard LCD. The R7s's potential for higher peak brightness and color accuracy would be noticeable in direct sunlight and media consumption. Bezels are likely slimmer on the R7s, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, we can infer differences based on the device tiers. The R7s likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the R7s is probable, reducing blur in photos and videos. The V7 Plus likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a less capable sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick with limited practical value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Aquos R7s's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant leap over the V7 Plus's MediaTek Helio G37 (12nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1's Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, coupled with Cortex-A710 performance cores, delivers substantially faster processing speeds for demanding applications and games. The 4nm fabrication process also translates to improved thermal efficiency, mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The Helio G37, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games and multitasking. The R7s likely benefits from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified, but the R7s's 27W wired charging with PD3 support offers a significant advantage over the V7 Plus's 18W charging. PD3 allows for faster and more efficient charging, potentially reducing 0-100% charge times considerably. While a larger battery on the V7 Plus might partially offset the slower charging, the R7s's faster charging is a convenience factor for power users. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1's 4nm process should also contribute to better power efficiency, potentially extending battery life despite its higher performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos V7 Plus if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and communication, and prioritize affordability above all else. You'll appreciate its efficiency and lower price tag. Buy the Sharp Aquos R7s if you demand smooth multitasking, demanding mobile gaming, and a more responsive user experience, and are willing to pay a premium for flagship-level performance and faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Aquos R7s overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to generate heat under sustained load. While Sharp's thermal management implementation will play a role, some throttling is possible during prolonged gaming. However, the 4nm process is more efficient than the Helio G37, meaning the R7s will likely handle longer gaming sessions before significant performance drops compared to other devices with the same chipset.
❓ Is the Helio G37 in the Aquos V7 Plus sufficient for playing popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G37 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. Expect occasional stuttering and reduced visual fidelity compared to devices with more powerful chipsets. It's suitable for casual gaming, but not ideal for competitive play.
❓ Does the Aquos R7s support fast charging protocols beyond PD3?
While PD3 is confirmed, it's unlikely the R7s supports other proprietary fast charging standards. PD3 is a widely adopted standard, ensuring compatibility with a broad range of chargers.
❓ How does the camera performance of the V7 Plus compare to other phones in its price range?
The V7 Plus's camera will likely be comparable to other phones in its price range, offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. However, it will struggle in low-light scenarios and lack the advanced features found on more expensive devices.
