Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Sharp Aquos V6 and ZTE Blade A52 are both contenders in the budget space, but they offer different strengths and weaknesses. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which one comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sharp Aquos V6 edges out the ZTE Blade A52 thanks to its more powerful chipset, USB Power Delivery 3.0 charging, and likely better overall software support. While both are budget options, the Aquos V6 provides a slightly smoother experience and faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 16 | Available. Released 2022, June 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 214 g (7.55 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery 3.0 | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey Sand, Deep Blue Sea | Space Gray, Silk Gold, Crystal Blue |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 90 EUR |
Sharp Aquos V6
- More powerful chipset (Helio G25)
- USB Power Delivery 3.0 charging
- Potentially better display quality
- Likely better software support
- May have limited availability in some regions
- Camera performance still limited by budget constraints
ZTE Blade A52
- Very affordable
- Basic and reliable
- Decent battery life
- Weaker chipset (Unisoc SC9863A)
- Slow 10W charging
- Lower display quality
- Limited camera capabilities
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature LCD displays around 6.5 inches. The Aquos V6 may offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to Sharp's display technology, but both will be adequate for everyday use. Expect HD+ resolution on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are often limited on budget phones. The Aquos V6 likely has a slightly better main camera sensor, potentially resulting in slightly better image quality in good lighting conditions. Both will likely struggle in low light. Expect a basic camera setup on both devices.
Performance
The Sharp Aquos V6's Mediatek Helio G25 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the ZTE Blade A52's Unisoc SC9863A. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the Aquos V6. The Blade A52 will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh) on both devices. However, the Sharp Aquos V6's USB Power Delivery 3.0 charging offers significantly faster charging speeds compared to the ZTE Blade A52's 10W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos V6 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and faster charging speeds, even on a budget. The ZTE Blade A52 is a good choice for those seeking a very basic smartphone with a focus on affordability and essential features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the chipsets in these phones?
The Sharp Aquos V6 uses a Mediatek Helio G25, which is significantly more powerful than the Unisoc SC9863A in the ZTE Blade A52. This impacts performance and responsiveness.
❓ How long does it take to charge each phone?
The Sharp Aquos V6 charges much faster thanks to USB Power Delivery 3.0. The ZTE Blade A52 uses standard 10W charging, which will take considerably longer.
