Sharp Aquos V6 vs Samsung Galaxy M10: A Budget Battle

Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Sharp Aquos V6 and Samsung Galaxy M10 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy M10 edges out the Aquos V6 thanks to its slightly more efficient chipset and impressive battery life. While the Aquos V6 boasts USB Power Delivery 3.0, the M10's overall performance and endurance make it the slightly better choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Sharp Aquos V6	Samsung Galaxy M10

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands	LTE	1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41
Speed	HSPA, LTE	HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE	GSM / HSPA / LTE
	-	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28

Launch
Announced	2022, February 16	2019, January. Released 2019, February
Status	Available. Released 2022, February 16	Discontinued

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back	Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions	165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in)	155.6 x 75.6 x 7.7 mm (6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	190 g (6.70 oz)	163 g (5.75 oz)

Display
Resolution	720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)	720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size	6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio)	6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD	PLS LCD

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)	Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
Chipset	Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm)	Exynos 7870 Octa (14 nm)
GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-T830 MP1
OS	Android 12	Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, One UI 2

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	32GB 3GB RAM	16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM
	-	eMMC 5.1

Main Camera
Dual	-	13 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide)
Features	LED flash	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Triple	13 MP, (wide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens	-
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Features	-	HDR
Single	5 MP	5 MP, f/2.0, 32mm (normal)
Video	Yes	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive	4.2, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	No
Positioning	GPS	GPS, GLONASS, BDS
Radio	No	FM radio
USB	USB Type-C 3.0	microUSB 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, proximity

Battery
Charging	USB Power Delivery 3.0	-
Type	Li-Ion 5000 mAh	Li-Ion 3400 mAh, non-removable

Misc
Colors	Grey Sand, Deep Blue Sea	Ocean Blue, Charcoal Black
Models	-	SM-M105F, SM-M105G, SM-M105Y, SM-M105M
Price	About 130 EUR	About 240 EUR
SAR	-	0.24 W/kg (head)
SAR EU	-	0.24 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body)

Tests
Audio quality	-	Noise -90.7dB / Crosstalk -94.5dB
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 89h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: 1182:1
Loudspeaker	-	Voice 66dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 80dB
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 64144 (v7) GeekBench: 3662 (v4.4) GFXBench: 3.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Sharp Aquos V6

USB Power Delivery 3.0 for fast charging
Simple and straightforward user interface
Potentially compact design (based on Aquos lineage)

Less powerful chipset
Unknown battery capacity
Limited camera details available
Potentially lower overall performance

Samsung Galaxy M10

Excellent battery life (89h endurance rating)
Decent display contrast ratio (1182:1)
More efficient chipset (Exynos 7870)
Reliable brand reputation

Older chipset
May lack some modern features
Design may be considered dated

Display Comparison

Both phones feature similar display technology, likely LCD panels. The Galaxy M10's contrast ratio of 1182:1 is impressive for a budget device, suggesting decent color reproduction and black levels. The Aquos V6's display details are less readily available, but it likely offers a comparable viewing experience. Expect adequate brightness and sharpness for everyday use.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is likely comparable on both devices, offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. Both phones feature Photo/Video capabilities. Low-light performance will likely be a weakness on both, typical for budget phones. Specific camera features and resolution are not readily available for the Aquos V6, making a direct comparison difficult.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy M10's Exynos 7870 Octa chipset, while older, is generally more efficient than the Aquos V6's Helio G25. The M10's 14nm process offers a slight advantage in power efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking and app loading on the M10. The Aquos V6's Helio G25 is adequate for basic tasks but may struggle with demanding games or heavy multitasking.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy M10 shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 89 hours is exceptional, indicating outstanding battery life. The Aquos V6's battery capacity is unknown, but it likely falls short of the M10's longevity. The Aquos V6's USB Power Delivery 3.0 offers faster charging, but the M10's larger battery means less frequent charging overall.

Buying Guide

The Sharp Aquos V6 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a simple, straightforward experience. The Samsung Galaxy M10 is a better fit for those needing long battery life and a reliable, all-around performer, even if it lacks the latest charging tech.