The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Sharp Aquos V6 and the Samsung Galaxy A04e. Both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but which one comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04e edges out the Aquos V6 thanks to its slightly faster processor and Samsung's generally reliable software support. While the Aquos V6 boasts USB Power Delivery 3.0, the A04e's overall performance and brand recognition make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, October 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 16 | Available. Released 2022, November 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery 3.0 | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey Sand, Deep Blue Sea | Black, Copper, Light Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS |
| Price | About 130 EUR | ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
Sharp Aquos V6
- USB Power Delivery 3.0 fast charging
- Potentially cleaner Android experience
- Decent display for the price
- Weaker processor than A04e
- Less brand recognition
- Camera likely not as refined
Samsung Galaxy A04e
- Slightly faster processor
- Samsung's reliable software support
- Generally better camera processing
- Strong brand reputation
- Slower charging speeds
- May have more pre-installed apps
- Display might not be as vibrant
Display Comparison
Both phones feature LCD displays, likely in the 6.5-inch range. Expect similar resolution (likely HD+). The Samsung might have slightly better color accuracy due to Samsung's display technology, but both will be adequate for everyday use. Viewing angles and brightness are likely comparable.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a primary camera around 13-50MP and a depth sensor. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Samsung's image processing is generally considered more refined, potentially resulting in slightly better photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Both will likely struggle with low-light photography.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04e's Helio P35 chipset offers a slight performance advantage over the Aquos V6's Helio G25. While both are entry-level processors, the A04e's higher clock speeds will translate to smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times. Gaming performance will be basic on both.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is likely around 5000mAh for both devices, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. The Aquos V6's USB Power Delivery 3.0 charging support is a significant advantage, allowing for faster charging speeds compared to the A04e's likely standard USB charging.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos V6 is a good option for users prioritizing fast charging and a potentially cleaner Android experience (depending on Sharp's software). The Samsung Galaxy A04e is ideal for those seeking a dependable, well-supported device from a trusted brand, even if it means sacrificing slightly faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones likely offer all-day battery life with moderate usage due to their similar battery capacities. However, the Aquos V6 charges significantly faster thanks to USB PD 3.0.
❓ Is the Sharp Aquos V6 worth buying if I prioritize fast charging?
Yes, the Aquos V6's USB PD 3.0 charging is a major advantage if fast charging is a priority. However, consider if the slightly slower processor and potentially less refined camera are acceptable tradeoffs.
