Google Pixel 7a vs. Sharp Aquos V6: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Tensor G2 chipset, coupled with Google’s computational photography, delivers a vastly improved experience in performance and camera quality. However, the Aquos V6 remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme affordability and basic functionality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos V6 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery 3.0 | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Grey Sand, Deep Blue Sea | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Sharp Aquos V6
- Significantly faster processor for smooth performance
- Superior camera quality with Google’s image processing
- Brighter, more vibrant OLED display
- Higher price point
- May not offer expandable storage
Google Pixel 7a
- Extremely affordable price
- USB Power Delivery 3.0 for fast wired charging
- Potentially good battery life under light usage
- Slow processor struggles with demanding tasks
- Inferior camera quality
- Likely a lower-quality display
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to the Aquos V6’s unspecified brightness. This translates to superior visibility outdoors. While the Aquos V6’s panel technology isn’t specified, it’s likely a standard LCD, whereas the Pixel 7a benefits from OLED technology, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (not specified for the Aquos V6) also contributes to a smoother scrolling experience, making it more pleasant for everyday use and gaming.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear winner. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in low-light conditions and offers features like Super Res Zoom. The Aquos V6’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a meaningful comparison, but given its price point, it likely features a basic sensor and limited image processing capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be far superior.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, built on a 5nm process, features a tri-cluster configuration with high-performance Cortex-X1 cores, delivering a significant leap in CPU and GPU performance compared to the Aquos V6’s MediaTek Helio G25. The Helio G25, fabricated on a 12nm node, relies on older Cortex-A53 cores, making it suitable for basic tasks but struggling with demanding applications. The Tensor G2’s integrated machine learning capabilities also enable features like Magic Eraser and Real Tone, unavailable on the Aquos V6. The Pixel 7a likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a achieved an endurance rating of 76 hours in our testing, indicating solid battery life. While the Aquos V6’s battery capacity is unknown, its less power-hungry chipset might offer comparable longevity under light usage. However, the Pixel 7a supports both 18W wired charging with Power Delivery 3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, offering greater convenience. The Aquos V6 only supports wired charging via USB Power Delivery 3.0, lacking wireless charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos V6 if you need a functional smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light web browsing, and your budget is extremely limited. You’ll appreciate its USB Power Delivery 3.0 for fast charging with compatible adapters. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize a smooth user experience, excellent camera performance, and access to Google’s latest software features and AI capabilities, even if it means spending more.