The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus and the TCL 30 SE. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sharp Aquos V6 Plus edges out the TCL 30 SE primarily due to its USB Power Delivery 3.0 charging, offering significantly faster charging speeds. While both share the same processor, the Aquos V6 Plus's charging advantage makes it a slightly better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA/APAC |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EMEA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, February 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 16 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (6165H/6165H1 only) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery 3.0 | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey Sand, Deep Blue Sea | Atlantic Blue, Space Gray, Glacial Blue |
| Models | SH-C04 | 6165H, 6156H1, 6165A, 6165A1, 6165S |
| Price | About 150 EUR | - |
Sharp Aquos V6 Plus
- Faster Charging (USB PD 3.0)
- Clean Android Experience
- Potentially slightly better display brightness
- Good Value
- Helio G25 chipset (limited performance)
- Camera performance is average
- Brand recognition may be lower
TCL 30 SE
- Established Brand
- Potentially lower price
- Decent Battery Life
- Good Value
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Helio G25 chipset (limited performance)
- Camera performance is average
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution, likely around 720p or 1080p depending on the exact model variant. Screen size is likely comparable, around 6.5 inches. Expect decent viewing angles and color accuracy for the price range, but don't anticipate flagship-level display quality. The Aquos V6 Plus might have a slightly brighter display, but this is speculative without specific brightness measurements.
Camera Comparison
Camera capabilities are likely similar, with both phones probably featuring a primary 13MP or 48MP camera and a depth sensor. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be a challenge. The Aquos V6 Plus might have slightly better image processing due to Sharp's tuning, but the difference is unlikely to be significant. Both will likely offer basic video recording capabilities.
Performance
Performance is virtually identical. Both devices utilize the Mediatek Helio G25 chipset, which is a budget-oriented processor. Expect adequate performance for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Demanding games and multitasking will likely result in noticeable slowdowns. Don't expect blazing-fast speeds from either device.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is likely around 5000mAh for both devices, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. However, the charging speed is where the Aquos V6 Plus shines. Its USB Power Delivery 3.0 support allows for significantly faster charging compared to the TCL 30 SE's 15W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos V6 Plus is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and a clean Android experience. The TCL 30 SE is a good option for those seeking a slightly more established brand and a potentially lower price point, though charging will be slower.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Helio G25 chipset good for gaming?
The Helio G25 is a budget chipset and not ideal for demanding games. You can play lighter games, but expect reduced graphics settings and potential lag.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones likely offer similar battery life (around a full day) with moderate usage. However, the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus charges significantly faster.
