The Sharp Aquos V6 Plus and Sony Xperia 10 IV represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Aquos V6 Plus aims for affordability with a focus on essential features, while the Xperia 10 IV prioritizes a more premium experience with 5G connectivity and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Sony Xperia 10 IV is the better choice. While both phones offer comparable battery endurance (163h), the Xperia 10 IV’s significantly more powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, brighter 683 nit display, and overall build quality justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 16 | Available. Released 2022, June 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 153 x 67 x 8.3 mm (6.02 x 2.64 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| | - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~457 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 84.1 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, 1B colors, HDR |
| | - | Triluminos display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0" |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery 3.0 | 21W wired (unofficial rating), PD, QC |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey Sand, Deep Blue Sea | Black, White, Mint, Lavender |
| Models | SH-C04 | XQ-CC54, XQ-CC72, SOG07 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | £ 99.99 / € 112.89 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 163h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.6 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 396008 (v9)
GeekBench: 1908 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos V6 Plus
- More affordable price point
- USB Power Delivery 3.0 support
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding chipset
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Likely inferior display quality
Sony Xperia 10 IV
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Higher price tag
- Charging speed is only 21W (unofficial)
- May require more frequent charging due to more powerful processor
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 10 IV boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 683 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Aquos V6 Plus. This makes the Xperia 10 IV far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While both displays are listed as having an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), the Xperia 10 IV’s OLED panel likely delivers superior blacks and color accuracy. The Aquos V6 Plus’s display technology is not specified, suggesting a less advanced LCD panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. However, the Xperia 10 IV’s brand reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline and potentially better low-light performance. The Aquos V6 Plus, positioned as a budget device, likely employs simpler camera hardware and software. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but Sony’s history points to a more capable camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Sony Xperia 10 IV utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring a Kryo 660 octa-core CPU with 2x2.2 GHz Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Silver cores. This is a substantial upgrade over the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus’s MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm) with its Cortex-A53 based octa-core CPU clocked at 2.0 GHz and 1.5 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Xperia 10 IV’s 5G capability is also a key advantage, while the Aquos V6 Plus is limited to 4G.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones share an endurance rating of 163 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the differing chipsets. The Xperia 10 IV supports 21W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD) and Quick Charge (QC), offering faster charging speeds than the Aquos V6 Plus’s USB Power Delivery 3.0, which doesn’t specify wattage. While the Aquos V6 Plus might have a slightly larger battery capacity (unspecified), the Xperia 10 IV’s more efficient chipset and faster charging provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus if you need a functional, budget-friendly smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are willing to compromise on performance and features. Buy the Sony Xperia 10 IV if you prioritize 5G connectivity, a brighter and more vibrant display for media consumption, and a smoother overall user experience, even if it means spending more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Xperia 10 IV powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship processor, it can handle Genshin Impact at lower settings (medium or low) with acceptable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense scenes. The Aquos V6 Plus’s Helio G25 would struggle significantly with this title.
❓ Does the Sony Xperia 10 IV support wireless charging?
No, the Sony Xperia 10 IV does not support wireless charging. It relies on 21W wired charging via USB-C with Power Delivery and Quick Charge compatibility. The Aquos V6 Plus also lacks wireless charging.
❓ How does the 5G connectivity on the Xperia 10 IV impact real-world speeds compared to 4G on the Aquos V6 Plus?
5G offers significantly faster download and upload speeds compared to 4G, provided you have 5G network coverage. In ideal conditions, you can expect speeds several times faster than 4G, enabling quicker downloads, smoother streaming, and lower latency for online gaming. The Aquos V6 Plus is limited to the slower speeds of 4G networks.
❓ What kind of storage options are available on each device, and can the storage be expanded?
Specific storage configurations aren't provided in the context data. However, based on market trends, the Xperia 10 IV likely offers more storage options and potentially a microSD card slot for expansion. The Aquos V6 Plus may have limited storage and a less certain microSD card slot availability.
