The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy A14. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the champion.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 takes the crown thanks to its significantly more powerful processor (especially the Exynos version), better camera capabilities, and wider availability. While the Aquos V6 Plus offers USB PD charging, the A14's overall performance and brand recognition make it the better choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery 3.0 | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey Sand, Deep Blue Sea | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | SH-C04 | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Sharp Aquos V6 Plus
- Fast Charging (USB PD 3.0)
- Clean Android Experience
- Potentially Taller Aspect Ratio Display
- Competitive Price
- Weaker Processor
- Less Powerful Camera
- Limited Availability
- Potentially Lower Screen Quality
Samsung Galaxy A14
- More Powerful Processor (Helio G80/Exynos 850)
- Better Camera System
- Wider Availability
- Samsung Brand Reliability
- Potentially Better Display Quality
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Samsung's One UI (can be polarizing)
- Potentially Higher Price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, likely around 6.5 inches. The Galaxy A14 is expected to have a slightly higher resolution (likely FHD+) and potentially better color accuracy. The Aquos V6 Plus might offer a taller aspect ratio, potentially impacting content consumption. We'll need to confirm specific panel types (LCD vs. AMOLED) for a more accurate assessment.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A14 is expected to have a more versatile camera system, likely including a higher-resolution main sensor and potentially ultrawide and macro lenses. The Aquos V6 Plus likely has a simpler camera setup. Image quality and low-light performance should be noticeably better on the A14.
Performance
This is where the Galaxy A14 pulls ahead. The Helio G80 (or Exynos 850) offers a substantial performance boost over the Helio G25. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A14. The Aquos V6 Plus will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature large batteries (around 5000mAh). While the Aquos V6 Plus has USB PD 3.0 for faster charging, the A14's battery optimization and more efficient processor could result in comparable or even slightly better real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos V6 Plus is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a clean, minimalist Android experience on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a better fit for those seeking a smoother performance, a more versatile camera system, and the reliability of the Samsung brand.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful processor.
❓ Does the Aquos V6 Plus have 5G?
Availability of 5G varies by region. Check local specifications for confirmation.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally offers longer software update support than Sharp, making the Galaxy A14 a better long-term investment.