Looking for a reliable smartphone without breaking the bank? The Sharp Aquos V6 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A04s are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to find out.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04s edges out the Aquos V6 Plus thanks to its more efficient chipset (Exynos 850) and slightly better overall performance. While both offer impressive battery life, the A04s's display and software experience give it a slight advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 16 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery 3.0 | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey Sand, Deep Blue Sea | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | SH-C04 | SM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 133.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1614:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 145123(v9)
GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos V6 Plus
- Clean Android experience
- USB Power Delivery 3.0 charging
- Potentially good value
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower brightness display (assumed)
- Limited camera details
- Less brand recognition
Samsung Galaxy A04s
- More efficient chipset (Exynos 850)
- Brighter display
- Better overall performance
- Established brand reputation
- Excellent battery life
- Samsung's One UI can be divisive
- 15W wired charging is relatively slow
Display Comparison
Both phones boast a high contrast ratio of 1614:1, delivering deep blacks. However, the Samsung Galaxy A04s has a measured peak brightness of 389 nits, which is noticeably brighter than the Aquos V6 Plus (brightness data unavailable, assumed lower). The A04s's display likely offers better outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both devices. However, the Samsung Galaxy A04s generally has a reputation for slightly better camera performance in its price range, often featuring a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. The Aquos V6 Plus's camera is likely adequate for basic photography.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04s's Exynos 850 (8nm) chipset is significantly more efficient than the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus's Mediatek Helio G25 (12nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the A04s. The A04s's CPU architecture (Cortex-A55) is also generally more efficient than the Aquos V6 Plus's (Cortex-A53).
Battery Life
Both phones excel in battery life, with the Samsung Galaxy A04s achieving an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours. The Aquos V6 Plus also offers excellent battery life, though specific figures are unavailable. Both should easily last a full day, even with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos V6 Plus is ideal for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and potentially USB-PD charging. The Samsung Galaxy A04s is a better choice for those seeking smoother performance, a slightly better display, and a more established brand reputation.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A04s has a more powerful and efficient chipset (Exynos 850) compared to the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus's Helio G25, resulting in better overall performance.
❓ Is the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus worth considering?
Yes, if you prioritize a clean Android experience and USB-PD charging, the Aquos V6 Plus can be a good value option. However, be aware of its limitations in performance and display brightness.
