Sharp Aquos V6 Plus vs Nokia C31: A Detailed Comparison

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus and the Nokia C31. Both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but which one comes out on top?
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Sharp Aquos V6 Plus edges out the Nokia C31 thanks to its significantly faster chipset, USB Power Delivery 3.0 charging, and likely better overall performance. While the Nokia C31 boasts Nokia's reputation for durability and software support, the Aquos V6 Plus provides a more responsive and modern user experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Sharp Aquos V6 Plus Nokia C31
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - South Africa, Egypt
Launch
Announced2022, February 162022, September 01
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, February 16Available. Released 2022, September 01
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in)169.2 x 78 x 8.6 mm (6.66 x 3.07 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight190 g (6.70 oz)200 g (7.05 oz)
 -Splash resistant
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320IMG8322
OSAndroid 12Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR
Single-5 MP
Triple50 MP, (wide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens13 MP, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP5 MP
Video1080p@30fpsYes
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive4.2, A2DP
NFCYesNo
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS
RadioNoWireless FM radio
USBUSB Type-C 3.0microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
ChargingUSB Power Delivery 3.010W wired
TypeLi-Ion 5000 mAhLi-Po 5050 mAh
Misc
ColorsGrey Sand, Deep Blue SeaCharcoal, Mint, Cyan
ModelsSH-C04TA-1499, TA-1497, TA-1493
PriceAbout 150 EURAbout 130 EUR
SAR EU-0.35 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)

Sharp Aquos V6 Plus

  • Faster Chipset (Helio G25)
  • USB Power Delivery 3.0 Charging
  • Potentially better display quality
  • Likely better gaming performance

  • Limited availability in some regions
  • Camera specs not fully detailed
  • Design may be less premium

Nokia C31

  • Nokia's reputation for durability
  • Clean Android experience
  • Reliable software updates
  • Potentially longer software support

  • Slower Chipset (Unisoc SC9863A)
  • Slow 10W charging
  • Lower overall performance
  • Camera likely less capable

Display Comparison

While specific display details are scarce, both phones likely feature LCD panels. The Aquos V6 Plus may offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to Sharp's display expertise, but this is speculative without concrete specifications. Screen size and resolution are likely comparable, both aiming for a comfortable viewing experience for everyday use.

Camera Comparison

Camera specifications are not fully available for either device. However, based on typical configurations for these price points, both will likely feature a primary rear camera (around 13-48MP) and potentially a depth sensor. Image quality will likely be similar, with both struggling in low-light conditions. The Aquos V6 Plus *might* have a slight edge due to potentially better image processing.

Performance

Here's where the Aquos V6 Plus shines. The Mediatek Helio G25, despite being a lower-tier chipset, is generally faster and more efficient than the Unisoc SC9863A found in the Nokia C31. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Aquos V6 Plus. Gaming performance will also be noticeably better.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh for both). However, the Aquos V6 Plus's USB Power Delivery 3.0 charging offers a significant advantage, allowing for much faster charging speeds compared to the Nokia C31's 10W wired charging.

Buying Guide

The Sharp Aquos V6 Plus is ideal for users prioritizing performance and faster charging speeds, even on a budget. The Nokia C31 is a good choice for those who value brand reliability, a clean Android experience, and a focus on durability, potentially at the expense of raw power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones likely have similar battery capacities, but the Sharp Aquos V6 Plus charges significantly faster thanks to USB Power Delivery 3.0.
❓ Will the Nokia C31 receive software updates for a long time?
Nokia is known for providing consistent and timely software updates, so the C31 is likely to receive updates for a longer period than the Aquos V6 Plus.