The Sharp Aquos V and Oppo A5 (2020) represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Aquos V, featuring the older but powerful Snapdragon 835, aims to deliver near-flagship performance at a lower price point. Conversely, the Oppo A5 (2020) prioritizes efficiency and features like reverse wireless charging with its Snapdragon 665 chipset. This comparison dissects these choices, helping you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and occasional demanding tasks, the Sharp Aquos V is the better choice thanks to its Snapdragon 835. However, the Oppo A5 (2020) offers a more balanced experience with better battery optimization and the convenience of reverse charging, making it ideal for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 38, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, November | 2019, September 21. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157 x 76 x 9 mm (6.18 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 75.4 x 9.1 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.9 inches, 89.8 cm2 (~75.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 540 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF, OIS
13 MP B/W | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3090 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Mirror Black, Dazzling White |
| Models | SH-C02 | CPH1931, CPH1959, CPH1933, CPH1935, CPH1943 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Sharp Aquos V
- Significantly more powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Potentially better image processing due to the Snapdragon 835's ISP
- May offer a smoother experience in graphically intensive games
- Likely shorter battery life due to the power-hungry Snapdragon 835
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Lacks reverse charging functionality
Oppo A5 (2020)
- Better battery life thanks to the efficient Snapdragon 665
- Convenient reverse wired charging for accessories
- More efficient thermal management, reducing throttling
- Noticeably slower performance compared to the Snapdragon 835
- May struggle with demanding games or applications
- Potentially lower image quality in challenging lighting conditions
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for display excellence. Given the context data focuses on chipsets, we can infer both likely feature LCD panels common in their price brackets. The Aquos V, being positioned as a slightly more premium device, *may* have a slightly higher peak brightness, but this is speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the design trends of 2020. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either device, focusing instead on cost-effectiveness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both phones feature multi-camera setups geared towards social media sharing. The Aquos V, potentially benefiting from the 835’s more powerful ISP, *might* offer slightly better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is unknown for both, but would be a significant advantage if present on either. We can expect both to include a standard wide lens and potentially an ultrawide or depth sensor, but the quality of these secondary sensors is likely to be limited.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Sharp Aquos V’s Snapdragon 835 (10nm) boasts a more powerful CPU – an octa-core configuration with 4x2.35 GHz Kryo cores and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo cores – compared to the Oppo A5 (2020)’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm) with its 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver setup. While the 665 benefits from a newer 11nm process, the 835’s architectural advantages and higher clock speeds translate to significantly better performance in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. However, the 835’s older architecture may be more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. The 665 prioritizes efficiency, offering a smoother experience for everyday tasks with less heat generation.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 (2020) distinguishes itself with reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Aquos V. While the mAh capacity isn’t specified for either, the Snapdragon 665’s superior power efficiency likely results in longer battery life for the A5 (2020) despite potentially having a smaller battery. The Aquos V’s more power-hungry Snapdragon 835 will drain the battery faster under heavy use. Charging wattage is also unknown, but the A5’s reverse charging capability adds a layer of convenience for users with wireless earbuds or other compatible devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos V if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and don't mind potentially shorter battery life. Buy the Oppo A5 (2020) if you prioritize all-day battery life, appreciate the convenience of reverse charging to top up accessories, and primarily use your phone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and communication.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 835 in the Aquos V struggle with newer, more demanding games released after 2020?
While the Snapdragon 835 was a flagship processor in its time, newer games optimized for more recent chipsets may exhibit reduced performance or require lower graphics settings on the Aquos V. Expect playable frame rates, but don't anticipate a top-tier gaming experience.
❓ How useful is the reverse charging feature on the Oppo A5 (2020) in real-world scenarios?
The reverse charging feature is particularly useful for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds, smartwatches, or even a friend's phone in a pinch. While it won't fully charge a device quickly, it provides a convenient way to add a few hours of usage.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 835 likely to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions on the Sharp Aquos V?
Due to its older architecture and higher power consumption, the Snapdragon 835 in the Aquos V is more susceptible to thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. Expect performance to decrease slightly after prolonged use as the phone attempts to manage heat.
