The Sharp Aquos V and Oppo A3s represent distinct points in the smartphone landscape. The Aquos V, powered by the Snapdragon 835, hails from a generation of devices pushing for flagship features at competitive prices. The Oppo A3s, with its Snapdragon 450, targets the ultra-budget market. This comparison dissects the core differences, revealing where the Aquos V’s older, higher-end chipset truly shines.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Sharp Aquos V is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 835 offers a significantly more responsive experience for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Oppo A3s provides basic functionality and 20W charging, it cannot compete with the Aquos V’s processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 38, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, November | 2018, July 13. Released 2018, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157 x 76 x 9 mm (6.18 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 156.2 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.15 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.9 inches, 89.8 cm2 (~75.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 540 | Adreno 506 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 8.1 (Oreo), ColorOS 5.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF, OIS
13 MP B/W | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3090 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4230 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Red, Dark Purple |
| Models | SH-C02 | CPH1803, CPH1853, CPH1805 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 11000 INR |
Sharp Aquos V
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 835)
- More efficient 10nm process node
- Potentially better camera performance
- Superior multitasking capabilities
- Likely lacks fast charging (compared to Oppo A3s)
- Older chipset, potentially limited software support
Oppo A3s
- Affordable price point
- 20W fast charging
- Potentially longer battery life in light usage
- Simpler, more streamlined user experience
- Slow processor (Snapdragon 450)
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
- Inferior gaming experience
- Lower quality camera
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, but given the Aquos V’s positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel than the A3s. The A3s, being an entry-level device, likely utilizes a simpler LCD. The Aquos V, aiming for a more premium feel, may have incorporated features like improved color accuracy or viewing angles. The absence of detailed display specs highlights the focus of these devices on internal performance versus display technology.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the Aquos V, being a more ambitious device, likely features a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Oppo A3s likely relies on software processing to compensate for a less capable sensor. The Snapdragon 835’s image signal processor (ISP) is also significantly more advanced, enabling better image quality, faster processing, and improved low-light performance compared to the ISP found in the Snapdragon 450.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Sharp Aquos V’s Snapdragon 835 (10nm) is a flagship-class processor featuring an octa-core configuration with Kryo cores clocked up to 2.35 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo A3s’ Snapdragon 450 (14nm), an entry-level chip with Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. The 10nm process node of the 835 is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The Kryo cores in the 835 also offer superior architectural efficiency compared to the A53 cores. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far more capable gaming experience on the Aquos V.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. However, the Oppo A3s’ 20W wired charging is a notable advantage. While the Aquos V’s battery life will depend on its capacity and the efficiency of the Snapdragon 835, the A3s can replenish its battery faster. The 14nm process of the Snapdragon 450, while less powerful, is less power-hungry than the 10nm 835, potentially offsetting some of the performance difference in everyday usage scenarios, but not under load.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos V if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, or value a smoother overall user experience. Its Snapdragon 835 provides longevity and performance headroom. Buy the Oppo A3s if you prioritize affordability above all else and only require a phone for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing. The 20W charging is a plus for this segment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 450 in the Oppo A3s struggle with modern apps?
Yes, the Snapdragon 450 is an entry-level processor and will likely exhibit noticeable lag and slowdowns when running demanding applications or multitasking heavily. It's best suited for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 835 in the Sharp Aquos V still capable of playing current mobile games?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 835 remains a capable processor for gaming, even in 2024. While it won't deliver the highest frame rates at maximum settings in the most graphically intensive titles, it can comfortably handle most games at medium to high settings with smooth performance.
❓ Does the Oppo A3s support software updates beyond Android 8.0 (likely its launch version)?
Software update support for the Oppo A3s is limited. Given its age and entry-level positioning, it's unlikely to have received major Android version updates beyond its initial release. Security patches may also be infrequent or non-existent.
❓ How does the thermal performance differ between the Aquos V and A3s during extended gaming?
The Aquos V, despite having a more powerful processor, benefits from the 10nm manufacturing process, which aids in heat dissipation. The Oppo A3s, with its less powerful Snapdragon 450, will likely run cooler, but the Aquos V’s thermal management should prevent significant throttling during prolonged gaming sessions.
