Sharp Aquos V vs Huawei P20 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Two 2018 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the Huawei P20 Pro emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its superior camera system and comparable battery life, coupled with a more refined software experience (despite potential limitations), outweigh the Aquos V’s marginally different processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos V | Huawei P20 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 38, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, November | 2018, March 27. Released 2018, April 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157 x 76 x 9 mm (6.18 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 155 x 73.9 x 7.8 mm (6.10 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2240 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.9 inches, 89.8 cm2 (~75.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 93.9 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) | Kirin 970 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 540 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, EMUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF, OIS 13 MP B/W | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 20 MP B/W, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.7" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Leica optics |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 24 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 22.5W wired, 58% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3090 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Gold |
| Models | SH-C02 | CLT-L29C, CLT-L29, CLT-L09C, CLT-L09, CLT-AL00, CLT-AL01, CLT-TL01, CLT-AL00L, CLT-L04, HW-01K, CLT-L0J |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 410 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.1dB / Crosstalk -92.1dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 89h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.087 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 71dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 91dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 209884 (v7) GeekBench: 6679 (v4.4) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos V
- Clean Android experience (potentially)
- Snapdragon 835 offers solid performance
- Potentially lower price point
- Kirin 970 has AI processing advantage
- Camera likely inferior to P20 Pro
- Charging speed likely slower
Huawei P20 Pro
- Superior camera system with AI enhancements
- Faster 22.5W charging
- More refined software experience
- Potential Google service limitations
- May require workarounds for app compatibility
- Software updates may be limited
Display Comparison
Both the Sharp Aquos V and Huawei P20 Pro boast displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) and a 4.087 sunlight contrast ratio, suggesting similar outdoor visibility. However, the context data lacks specifics on panel technology (OLED vs LCD), resolution, or refresh rate. Given the P20 Pro’s flagship status, it likely features an OLED panel offering superior color accuracy and black levels compared to a potential LCD on the Aquos V. Bezels are also a key consideration, and without specific measurements, it’s difficult to definitively state which device offers a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Huawei P20 Pro’s camera system was a standout feature at its launch, and remains a strong point. While the context data doesn’t detail sensor sizes or specific lens configurations, the P20 Pro is renowned for its triple-lens setup, including a 40MP main sensor with a wide aperture. This allows for exceptional low-light performance and detail capture. The Aquos V’s camera specifications are unknown, but it’s unlikely to match the P20 Pro’s capabilities, particularly in image processing and dynamic range. The P20 Pro’s AI scene recognition, powered by the Kirin 970’s NPU, further enhances image quality by optimizing settings for different shooting scenarios.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets: Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 835 in the Aquos V versus Huawei’s Kirin 970 in the P20 Pro. Both are 10nm processors, but the Kirin 970 incorporates a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI tasks, a feature absent in the Snapdragon 835. While the CPU core counts are similar (Octa-core), the Kirin 970’s Cortex-A73 cores operate at a slightly higher clock speed (2.4 GHz vs 2.35 GHz). This, combined with the NPU, gives the P20 Pro an edge in AI-accelerated tasks like scene recognition in the camera. The Aquos V’s Kryo cores, while efficient, lack the specialized hardware of the Kirin 970. Thermal management is also a factor; the Snapdragon 835 was known for some throttling under sustained load, a potential issue the Kirin 970 may mitigate with its more advanced cooling solutions.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an impressive endurance rating of 89 hours, suggesting comparable battery life. However, the P20 Pro boasts 22.5W wired charging, capable of reaching 58% charge in just 30 minutes. The Aquos V’s charging speed is not specified, but is likely slower. This faster charging capability provides a significant convenience advantage for the P20 Pro, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. While both phones offer excellent endurance, the P20 Pro’s charging speed is a clear win.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos V if you prioritize a clean Android experience and are comfortable with potentially limited software updates. It’s a solid option for users seeking a functional, no-frills flagship experience. Buy the Huawei P20 Pro if you value camera quality, fast charging, and a more polished user interface, understanding that access to Google services may require workarounds.