The Sharp Aquos sense7 plus and the Xiaomi 13T Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Sharp prioritizes a balanced experience, while the Xiaomi 13T Pro aggressively targets performance with its flagship-level Dimensity 9200+ chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ processor delivers significantly faster performance, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. However, the Sharp Sense7 Plus offers a more conservative, potentially more efficient experience for those prioritizing battery longevity over raw power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.30 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO OLED, 1B colors, 1300 nits (peak), 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", dual pixel PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 15mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moon silver | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | - | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 420 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
- Potentially better standby battery life due to 6nm Snapdragon 695.
- Likely a more conservative and refined software experience.
- May offer longer software support based on Sharp's history.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Xiaomi 13T Pro.
- Display likely lacks the brightness and smoothness of the Xiaomi.
- Charging speed is likely much slower.
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Exceptional performance thanks to the Dimensity 9200+ chipset.
- Ultra-fast 120W charging for minimal downtime.
- Bright and vibrant display with likely higher refresh rate.
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be resource-intensive.
- May receive fewer long-term software updates compared to Sharp.
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1094 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Sharp. While the Sharp’s display quality isn’t detailed, the Xiaomi’s high peak brightness ensures excellent visibility outdoors. The Xiaomi likely utilizes a higher refresh rate panel as well, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching rather than variable refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, given Xiaomi’s recent focus on camera technology, the 13T Pro likely features a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing. The Sharp, traditionally, focuses on a more natural image processing style. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Xiaomi’s flagship-level chipset provides more processing power for computational photography features.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Xiaomi 13T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) is in a different league than the Sharp’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 9200+ features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, offering a significant uplift in single-core performance. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695, while efficient, can’t compete with the 4nm node of the Dimensity 9200+ in terms of raw power and thermal efficiency under sustained load. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Xiaomi.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. While the Sharp’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Xiaomi’s active use score of 11:50h and endurance rating of 102h suggest excellent battery life. The faster charging speed of the Xiaomi significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The 6nm Snapdragon 695 in the Sharp may offer slightly better standby efficiency, but the Xiaomi’s larger battery and optimized software likely offset this advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos sense7 plus if you need a reliable, everyday phone with a focus on efficiency and a potentially longer software support lifecycle, and aren't demanding of intensive gaming or video editing. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you prioritize speed, responsiveness, and fast charging, and enjoy pushing your phone to its limits with demanding applications and games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Xiaomi 13T Pro's Dimensity 9200+ chipset get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9200+ is a powerful chip, Xiaomi likely incorporates effective thermal management solutions, such as vapor chamber cooling, to mitigate overheating. However, sustained gaming at maximum settings will inevitably generate heat. Expect some throttling, but the 13T Pro should maintain a playable frame rate for extended periods.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the Sharp Aquos sense7 plus a significant drawback?
Sharp typically prioritizes accurate color reproduction and natural image processing over aggressive computational photography. While the sensor specifications may not be cutting-edge, the image quality is likely to be pleasing, especially in well-lit conditions. However, the Xiaomi 13T Pro will likely excel in low-light scenarios and offer more versatile camera features.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 695 in the Sharp Sense7 Plus handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a stable frame rate. Don't expect the same level of performance as the Xiaomi 13T Pro, which can handle PUBG Mobile at maximum settings with ease.
