The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Sony Xperia 10 VII and Sharp Aquos sense7 plus represent compelling options for budget-conscious consumers. While both devices leverage Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, they diverge significantly in their approach to battery life, display technology, and overall user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a brighter display, the Sony Xperia 10 VII emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, coupled with exceptional battery endurance (48:10h), outweighs the Aquos sense7 plus’s slightly older Snapdragon 695. However, the Aquos sense7 plus remains a viable option for those seeking a more affordable 5G experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August | 2025, September 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2025, September 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.30 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 153 x 72 x 8.3 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~422 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO OLED, 1B colors, 1300 nits (peak), 120Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", dual pixel PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 15mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0" |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wired, PD, QC |
| Type | Li-Ion 5050 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moon silver | White, Turquoise, Charcoal |
| Models | - | XQ-FE54, XQZ-CBFE, xqfe54eukcl.gc, xqfe54eukcw.gc, xqfe54eukcb.gc |
| Price | About 420 EUR | $ 459.99 / £ 329.00 / € 379.00 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | - | 48:10h endurance, 1400 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class D |
Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Functional and reliable performance for basic tasks
- Less efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Potentially lower display brightness
Sony Xperia 10 VII
- Exceptional battery life (48:10h endurance)
- Brighter display (1064 nits)
- More efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially higher price
- May lack some advanced camera features
- Not a flagship-level performer
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 10 VII boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1064 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While the Aquos sense7 plus’s display specifications are not provided, Sony’s emphasis on display quality typically translates to superior color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of LTPO technology in either device suggests both utilize standard refresh rate panels, impacting power consumption less than variable refresh rate implementations, but also limiting dynamic smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Aquos sense7 plus, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Sony’s Xperia line generally prioritizes image processing and color science. The Xperia 10 VII likely benefits from Sony’s image signal processor (ISP) and algorithms, potentially delivering more refined images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes on the Aquos sense7 plus makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance. It's reasonable to assume both devices will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the Xperia 10 VII’s processing capabilities likely provide a more consistent experience.
Performance
The Xperia 10 VII’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a clear architectural upgrade over the Aquos sense7 plus’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially reduced throttling under sustained loads. The CPU configuration further favors the Xperia 10 VII, with its 4x Cortex-A78 cores providing a substantial performance boost over the Aquos sense7 plus’s 2x Kryo 660 Gold cores. This difference will be most noticeable in multitasking and more demanding applications. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the Xperia 10 VII’s chipset is better equipped to leverage it efficiently.
Battery Life
The Sony Xperia 10 VII’s battery performance is its standout feature. The reported 48:10h endurance and 12:57h active use score demonstrate exceptional longevity. While the Aquos sense7 plus’s battery capacity is unknown, the Snapdragon 695’s less efficient 6nm process and potentially lower capacity would likely result in significantly shorter battery life. The Xperia 10 VII also supports wired charging with PD and QC standards, offering faster and more versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos sense7 plus if you need a functional 5G smartphone at the lowest possible price point and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. Buy the Sony Xperia 10 VII if you prioritize all-day battery life, a brighter and more usable display in outdoor conditions, and a more modern chipset offering improved efficiency and performance for everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 in the Xperia 10 VII offer a noticeable performance improvement over the Snapdragon 695 in the Aquos sense7 plus for gaming?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3’s newer architecture and more powerful CPU cores (Cortex-A78 vs Kryo 660 Gold) will provide a noticeable improvement in gaming performance. While neither phone is a dedicated gaming device, the Xperia 10 VII will handle more demanding titles with smoother frame rates and less stuttering.
❓ How does the charging speed of the Xperia 10 VII compare to what is typically found on devices with the Snapdragon 695?
The Xperia 10 VII supports PD and QC charging standards, allowing for faster charging speeds than many devices utilizing the Snapdragon 695. While specific wattage isn't provided, the inclusion of these standards indicates a more versatile and efficient charging experience compared to basic charging solutions often found in the Aquos sense7 plus’s price bracket.
❓ Is the difference in battery life between the two phones significant enough to impact daily usage?
Absolutely. The Xperia 10 VII’s 48:10h endurance is exceptional and translates to potentially two full days of use for many users. The Aquos sense7 plus, while likely offering adequate battery life, will almost certainly require daily charging, especially with moderate to heavy usage.
