Google Pixel 7a vs. Sharp Aquos sense7 plus: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset provides significantly faster performance and unlocks advanced features like Magic Eraser, while its camera consistently delivers exceptional image quality. However, the Aquos sense7 plus offers a compelling alternative for those prioritizing battery efficiency and a more conservative design.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos sense7 plus | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.30 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO OLED, 1B colors, 1300 nits (peak), 120Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", dual pixel PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 15mm (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5050 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moon silver | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
- Superior performance with the Google Tensor G2
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Faster charging and wireless charging support
- Potentially higher price point
- May experience more thermal throttling under heavy load
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent battery efficiency with the Snapdragon 695
- More understated and subtle design
- Potentially lower price point
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Pixel 7a
- Less advanced camera features and image quality
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight, a metric the Aquos sense7 plus’s display specifications do not provide. While the Aquos sense7 plus likely has a respectable brightness, the Pixel 7a’s higher output is a clear advantage. Both devices likely utilize OLED panels, common in this price bracket, but the Pixel 7a’s display is known for its color accuracy and smooth 90Hz refresh rate (not specified for the Aquos), enhancing the overall viewing experience. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective form factors.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a major selling point, leveraging Google’s renowned computational photography. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, the Pixel 7a’s image processing excels in dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. The Aquos sense7 plus’s camera capabilities are less well-defined, and likely focus on providing a solid, reliable experience without the advanced features of the Pixel. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also superior, offering features like Cinematic Blur and improved stabilization. Ignoring the likely inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on the Aquos sense7 plus (often of limited practical use), the Pixel 7a’s overall camera system is a clear winner.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Sharp Aquos sense7 plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Tensor G2 features a tri-cluster configuration with Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz, designed for demanding tasks, while the Snapdragon 695 relies on Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Pixel 7a. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Aquos sense7 plus will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or complex applications.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating strong battery life despite its 18W charging. The Aquos sense7 plus’s battery capacity is not specified, but its Snapdragon 695 chipset is known for its efficiency. While the Pixel 7a offers PD3.0 fast charging and 7.5W wireless charging, the Aquos sense7 plus’s charging speed is unknown. The Pixel 7a’s faster charging, combined with its respectable endurance rating, provides a more convenient user experience, even if the Aquos sense7 plus might offer slightly longer screen-on time due to its more efficient processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos sense7 plus if you prioritize long battery life and a more subtle, less attention-grabbing design, and are comfortable with a less powerful processor for everyday tasks. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a superior camera experience, faster performance for demanding apps and games, and access to Google’s latest software features and AI capabilities.