Both the Sharp Aquos sense5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G target the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. The Aquos sense5G, powered by the Snapdragon 690, aims for a balance of efficiency and performance, while the Redmi Note 10 5G leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 700 to deliver strong processing power at an aggressive price point. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G emerges as the stronger choice. While both phones offer comparable battery endurance, the Redmi Note 10 5G’s Dimensity 700 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and its generally lower price makes it a more compelling value proposition.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 25. Released 2021, June 10 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 148 x 71 x 8.9 mm (5.83 x 2.80 x 0.35 in) | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810H compliant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~435 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.8 inches, 84.0 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO IPS LCD, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619L | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), AF
12 MP, f/2.4, 121˚ (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 27W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4570 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Satin Gold, Titanium Black | Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray, Nighttime Blue, Aurora Green |
| Models | SHG03 | M2103K19G, M2103K19C |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 96.62 / £ 107.59 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1795:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.0 LUFS (Good)
|
Sharp Aquos sense5G
- Faster 27W wired charging
- Potentially cleaner software experience (regional dependent)
- Efficient Snapdragon 690 chipset
- Less powerful CPU compared to Dimensity 700
- Likely less vibrant display
- Limited camera details available
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Generally lower price point
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Xiaomi’s MIUI can be resource intensive
- Potential for more bloatware
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 492 nits compared to the Redmi Note 10 5G’s nominal 1795:1 contrast ratio. While both share the same contrast ratio, the higher peak brightness of the Redmi Note 10 5G translates to better visibility in outdoor conditions. Details regarding the Aquos sense5G’s display are limited, but given its market positioning, it likely utilizes an IPS LCD panel, potentially lacking the vibrancy of the Redmi Note 10 5G’s panel. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is a common trade-off in this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are scarce. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 10 5G’s camera system is likely to be more versatile due to Xiaomi’s more aggressive camera hardware implementation in its mid-range devices. The Aquos sense5G, while potentially offering good image quality in ideal conditions, may lack the advanced features and processing capabilities found in the Redmi Note 10 5G. It's safe to assume the Redmi Note 10 5G will have a more robust camera app with more modes and features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Sharp Aquos sense5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm), while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Dimensity 700, with its Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, offers a performance advantage over the Snapdragon 690’s Kryo 560 Gold cores at 2.0 GHz. The 7nm process node of the Dimensity 700 also contributes to improved power efficiency. While both are capable 5G modems, the Dimensity 700 generally exhibits stronger multi-core performance, benefiting demanding applications and multitasking. The Redmi Note 10 5G is likely to provide a smoother experience in graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Both the Sharp Aquos sense5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Aquos sense5G supports 27W wired charging, while the Redmi Note 10 5G is limited to 18W. This means the Aquos sense5G can replenish its battery faster, potentially offsetting any slight capacity differences. Despite the faster charging, the similar endurance ratings suggest that both phones are optimized for efficient power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos sense5G if you prioritize a potentially cleaner software experience (depending on regional variations) and a slightly faster charging solution. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G if you prioritize raw processing power for gaming and multitasking, a brighter display, and maximizing value for your money. The Redmi Note 10 5G is the better option for users who want the most performance per dollar.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the Redmi Note 10 5G get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 700 is a capable chipset, it can exhibit some thermal throttling during prolonged, demanding gaming. However, the Redmi Note 10 5G’s thermal design is generally adequate for moderate gaming, and performance remains consistent for most titles. The 7nm process helps mitigate heat compared to older chipsets.
❓ Is the 27W charging on the Aquos sense5G a significant advantage over the Redmi Note 10 5G’s 18W charging in real-world use?
Yes, the 27W charging on the Aquos sense5G will result in faster charging times. While both phones have similar battery endurance, the Aquos sense5G can top up its battery more quickly, which is beneficial for users who frequently need a quick charge.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Sharp Aquos sense5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G?
The Aquos sense5G typically runs a near-stock Android experience, which appeals to users who prefer a clean and uncluttered interface. The Redmi Note 10 5G runs Xiaomi’s MIUI, which is heavily customized and offers a wide range of features, but can also include bloatware and a steeper learning curve.
