The mid-range 5G smartphone market is crowded, and choosing the right device can be tough. Today, we're pitting the Sharp Aquos Sense 5G against the Sony Xperia 10 IV to see which offers the best blend of features, performance, and value. Let's dive in!
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sony Xperia 10 IV edges out the Aquos Sense 5G thanks to its brighter display, slightly more powerful chipset, and impressive battery life. While the Aquos offers a clean experience, the Xperia’s overall package provides a more compelling experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 25. Released 2021, June 10 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, June 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 148 x 71 x 8.9 mm (5.83 x 2.80 x 0.35 in) | 153 x 67 x 8.3 mm (6.02 x 2.64 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~435 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~457 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.8 inches, 84.0 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 84.1 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO IPS LCD, HDR10 | OLED, 1B colors, HDR |
| | - | Triluminos display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS | UFS |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0" |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), AF
12 MP, f/2.4, 121˚ (ultrawide) | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 27W wired | 21W wired (unofficial rating), PD, QC |
| Type | Li-Ion 4570 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Satin Gold, Titanium Black | Black, White, Mint, Lavender |
| Models | SHG03 | XQ-CC54, XQ-CC72, SOG07 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | £ 99.99 / € 112.89 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 163h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.6 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 396008 (v9)
GeekBench: 1908 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos sense5G
- Clean Android experience
- Compact form factor
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 27W fast charging
- Less bright display
- Potentially weaker camera
- Shorter battery life
- Less powerful chipset
Sony Xperia 10 IV
- Brighter, high-contrast display
- Longer battery life
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Versatile camera system
- PD & QC charging support
- Design can feel dated
- Charging speed could be faster
- Software updates can be slow
Display Comparison
The Xperia 10 IV boasts a significantly brighter display (683 nits vs. likely around 450-500 nits for the Aquos Sense 5G), making it easier to see outdoors. The 'infinite' contrast ratio claim on the Xperia is likely due to its OLED panel, offering deeper blacks and richer colors compared to the Aquos Sense 5G's LCD. While both offer a smooth viewing experience, the Xperia's display is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer decent camera capabilities, but the Xperia 10 IV likely has a more versatile setup. While specific camera specs are missing for the Aquos Sense 5G, Sony's reputation for camera quality suggests the Xperia will deliver better image processing and potentially more features. Expect good, but not exceptional, photo and video quality from both.
Performance
The Xperia 10 IV's Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) offers a slight performance advantage over the Aquos Sense 5G's Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm). While both are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Xperia will likely feel snappier when multitasking or running more demanding apps. Both phones have 6GB of RAM, which should be sufficient for most users.
Battery Life
The Xperia 10 IV shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 163 hours. This significantly surpasses what we'd expect from the Aquos Sense 5G, which likely has a smaller battery capacity. The Xperia's efficient chipset and optimized software contribute to its exceptional longevity.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos Sense 5G is ideal for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and a compact form factor. The Sony Xperia 10 IV is a better choice for those who value a bright, high-contrast display, longer battery life, and a more versatile camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Sony Xperia 10 IV has significantly better battery life, with an endurance rating of 163 hours, compared to the likely shorter battery life of the Sharp Aquos Sense 5G.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 5G faster than the Snapdragon 690 5G?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Xperia 10 IV is generally considered slightly faster and more efficient than the Snapdragon 690 5G in the Aquos Sense 5G, thanks to its smaller 6nm manufacturing process.
