Sharp Aquos Sense4 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Aquos Sense4 Plus’s Snapdragon 720G, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and improved gaming. While battery endurance is similar, the A52s 5G’s faster 25W charging is a key advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos sense4 plus | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 11. Released 2020, September 11 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 78 x 8.8 mm (6.54 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, 40mm (telephoto macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4120 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Deep Fog Black, Cloud White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 600 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos sense4 plus
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler software experience (potentially)
- Comparable battery endurance
- Significantly weaker processor
- Less detailed display specifications
- Unspecified charging speed
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Much faster Snapdragon 778G processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- 25W fast charging support
- Potentially higher price
- Samsung’s One UI software (preference-based)
- May have more bloatware
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Aquos Sense4 Plus. This higher brightness ensures better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the A52s 5G’s Super AMOLED panel likely delivers richer colors and deeper blacks. The Aquos Sense4 Plus’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially less vibrant viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information for the Aquos Sense4 Plus is lacking. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms. Without specific details on the Aquos Sense4 Plus’s main sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the A52s 5G. The A52s 5G’s camera system is likely more versatile, offering better dynamic range and detail in various lighting conditions. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A52s 5G is also a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Sharp Aquos Sense4 Plus’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 778G utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – versus the 720G’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver configuration. The 6nm process node of the 778G also contributes to improved power efficiency and sustained performance under load. This translates to a more responsive user experience and better gaming performance on the A52s 5G.
Battery Life
Both the Sharp Aquos Sense4 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the A52s 5G supports 25W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster replenishment of the battery compared to the Aquos Sense4 Plus’s unspecified charging speed. This faster charging is a practical benefit for users who need to quickly top up their device throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos Sense4 Plus if you prioritize a potentially simpler software experience and are on a very tight budget, accepting a noticeable performance compromise. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value performance, faster charging, and a more widely recognized brand with a robust software update track record. The A52s 5G is ideal for users who frequently game, stream video, or multitask.