Sharp Aquos Sense4 Plus vs OnePlus Nord N10 5G: Which Budget 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the Sharp Aquos sense4 plus is the better choice. While the OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts 30W charging, the Aquos sense4 plus’s Snapdragon 720G offers a more balanced experience, potentially leading to longer-term usability and smoother multitasking.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos sense4 plus | OnePlus Nord N10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 11. Released 2020, September 11 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 78 x 8.8 mm (6.54 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, 40mm (telephoto macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4120 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Deep Fog Black, Cloud White | Midnight Ice |
| Models | - | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279579 (v8) GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos sense4 plus
- More powerful CPU for smoother multitasking
- Efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset for better thermal management
- Potentially superior image processing due to the 720G's ISP
- Slower charging speeds compared to the Nord N10 5G
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially lower brightness
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- 30W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Higher display brightness for better outdoor visibility
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Aquos sense4 plus
- Snapdragon 690 may exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G’s display is measured at 440 nits of peak brightness and a 1447:1 contrast ratio, suggesting a reasonably vibrant image, but the Aquos sense4 plus’s display specifications are not provided. Given the Aquos sense4 plus’s focus on efficiency, it likely prioritizes power saving over peak brightness. The N10 5G’s higher brightness will be more visible outdoors, but the Aquos sense4 plus may offer better battery life due to a potentially more efficient panel. The absence of refresh rate data for the Aquos sense4 plus suggests it likely operates at the standard 60Hz, while the N10 5G’s display is confirmed to support higher refresh rates, offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 720G’s image signal processor (ISP) generally offers more advanced features and better image processing capabilities than the ISP found in the Snapdragon 690. This suggests the Aquos sense4 plus may produce higher-quality photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of details regarding optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light video performance.
Performance
Both phones utilize 8nm process technology, but the Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G in the Aquos sense4 plus features a more powerful CPU configuration: octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) compared to the Snapdragon 690 (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) in the Nord N10 5G. This higher clock speed on the prime cores of the 720G translates to faster single-core performance, beneficial for app launch times and responsiveness. While the Snapdragon 690 offers 5G connectivity, the 720G is known for its balanced performance and efficiency, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during extended use. The Aquos sense4 plus is likely to handle demanding tasks and multitasking more smoothly.
Battery Life
Both the Sharp Aquos sense4 plus and the OnePlus Nord N10 5G achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Nord N10 5G’s 30W wired charging significantly outperforms the Aquos sense4 plus’s unspecified wired charging. This means the N10 5G can replenish its battery much faster, reducing downtime. While both phones offer comparable endurance, the N10 5G’s faster charging is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos sense4 plus if you need a phone that prioritizes efficient performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and you value a chipset known for its thermal management. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you prefer faster charging speeds and a display with a higher refresh rate, and are willing to potentially trade off some sustained performance for those features.