Sony Xperia 1 VII vs. Sharp Aquos R9 Pro: A Flagship Showdown

The Sony Xperia 1 VII and Sharp Aquos R9 Pro represent distinct approaches to the high-end smartphone market. The Xperia 1 VII, with its Snapdragon 8 Elite and focus on multimedia, clashes with the Aquos R9 Pro’s more value-oriented Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. This comparison dissects their core strengths to determine which device best suits demanding users.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and exceptional battery life, the Sony Xperia 1 VII emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and impressive 43:30h endurance significantly outperform the Aquos R9 Pro, despite the latter’s competitive price point.

PHONES
Phone Names Sharp Aquos R9 pro Sony Xperia 1 VII
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, October 292025, May 13
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, FebruaryAvailable. Released 2025, June 04
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame
Dimensions162 x 78 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.07 x 0.37 in)162 x 74 x 8.2 mm (6.38 x 2.91 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight220 g (7.76 oz)197 g (6.95 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5
Resolution1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~513 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypePRO IGZO LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1000 nits (HBM), 2000 nits (peak)LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 830
OSAndroid 14, up to 3 major Android upgradesAndroid 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLeica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaZeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking
Triple50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50.3 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (telephoto), 1/1.56", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 2.8x optical zoom 50.3 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", PDAF48 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.35", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (telephoto), f/3.5, 170mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3.5x-7.1x continuous optical zoom, OIS, 4cm macro @ 120mm, no AF 48 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR4K@24/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single50.3 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), PDAF12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.22µm
Video1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive6.0, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, Display Port 1.4USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, video output
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass
Battery
Charging32W wired, Qi 15W wireless30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless
Type5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlackMoss Green, Orchid Purple, Slate Black
ModelsSH-54E, SH-M30XQ-FS54, XQFS54EUKCG.GC, XQFS54EUKCV.GC, XQFS54EUKCB.GC, PDX256
PriceAbout 1000 EUR€ 1,338.99 / $ 1,394.99 / £ 1,149.94
EU LABEL
Battery-43:30h endurance, 1400 cycles
Energy-Class B
Free fall-Class B (181 falls)
Repairability-Class D

Sharp Aquos R9 pro

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers strong performance
  • 32W wired charging is competitive

  • Likely lower sustained performance than Xperia 1 VII
  • Battery life likely inferior to Xperia 1 VII
  • Limited information available on camera capabilities

Sony Xperia 1 VII

  • Snapdragon 8 Elite delivers top-tier performance
  • Exceptional battery life (43:30h endurance)
  • Fast 30W charging with PD3.0/PPS

  • Higher price tag
  • May not be as readily available as the Aquos R9 Pro
  • Sony's software can be polarizing

Display Comparison

The Sony Xperia 1 VII boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1475 nits, crucial for outdoor visibility. While the Aquos R9 Pro’s display specs are currently unavailable, Sony’s history suggests a focus on color accuracy and potentially a high refresh rate. The Xperia 1 VII’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for users frequently exposed to direct sunlight. The absence of LTPO information for the Aquos R9 Pro suggests it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving like the Xperia 1 VII likely does.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for the Aquos R9 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, Sony’s Xperia line is renowned for its camera prowess, and the 1 VII likely features advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor than the Aquos R9 Pro. The Xperia 1 VII’s image processing will likely prioritize color accuracy and dynamic range, while the Aquos R9 Pro may lean towards a more vibrant, consumer-friendly look. The absence of information regarding OIS and lens apertures on the Aquos R9 Pro makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the Xperia 1 VII.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Sony Xperia 1 VII utilizes the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This contrasts with the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm). The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite offers superior transistor density and power efficiency, translating to higher sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The Oryon cores, designed by Qualcomm, are expected to deliver a noticeable performance uplift over the Cortex cores in the 8s Gen 3, particularly in demanding tasks. The Aquos R9 Pro’s 8s Gen 3 is still a capable chip, but the Xperia 1 VII holds a clear advantage in raw processing power.

Battery Life

The Sony Xperia 1 VII’s battery performance is a standout feature, offering an impressive 43:30h endurance and a 15:32h active use score. This is significantly better than what is typically seen in flagship devices. While both phones support 15W wireless charging, the Xperia 1 VII’s 30W wired charging with PD3.0 and PPS allows for a 50% charge in just 30 minutes. The Aquos R9 Pro’s 32W wired charging is comparable, but the Xperia 1 VII’s superior battery endurance and faster charging protocol provide a more convenient user experience. The Xperia 1 VII also offers reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the Aquos R9 Pro.

Buying Guide

Buy the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro if you need a powerful flagship experience at a potentially lower price, and are comfortable with slightly less sustained performance and a more standard battery life. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 VII if you prioritize top-tier processing power, extended battery endurance for all-day use, and a premium multimedia experience, and are willing to pay a premium for it.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Aquos R9 Pro throttle under sustained load, like during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a capable chip, its 4nm process and less aggressive cooling solution (compared to the Xperia 1 VII) may lead to thermal throttling during prolonged, demanding tasks like gaming. Expect some performance reduction after extended use, whereas the Xperia 1 VII’s 3nm Snapdragon 8 Elite is better equipped to maintain peak performance for longer.
❓ How does the Xperia 1 VII’s battery endurance translate to real-world usage for a typical user?
The Xperia 1 VII’s 43:30h endurance means a typical user can realistically expect over a day and a half of use on a single charge. This translates to comfortably handling a full day of calls, browsing, social media, and media consumption without needing to reach for a charger. The 15:32h active use score confirms its ability to handle intensive tasks for extended periods.
❓ Is the lack of reverse wireless charging on the Aquos R9 Pro a significant drawback?
For most users, reverse wireless charging is a convenience feature rather than a necessity. However, it can be useful for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds or smartwatches. The absence of this feature on the Aquos R9 Pro means you’ll need a separate charger for those devices.