Sharp Aquos R8s vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and sustained gaming, the Sharp Aquos R8s is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. However, the Google Pixel 7 Pro offers a more refined software experience, superior camera processing, and faster charging, making it the better all-rounder for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos R8s | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 06 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 74 x 8.7 mm (6.26 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", dual pixel PDAF 13 MP, f/2.3, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, 118˚ (ultrawide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4750 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, White | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | SH‑52D | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 700 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos R8s
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- More efficient 4nm fabrication process
- Potentially better thermal management
- Significantly slower 15W charging
- Limited information on camera capabilities
- Potentially lacks variable refresh rate display
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Excellent camera with AI-powered features
- Fast 23W wired and wireless charging
- Smooth software experience with guaranteed updates
- Less powerful Tensor G2 chipset
- Older CPU core architecture
- May throttle under sustained heavy load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Aquos R8s’ display specifications are not provided, Sharp historically focuses on color accuracy. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio ensures deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of LTPO information for the R8s suggests it may lack the variable refresh rate technology found on the Pixel 7 Pro, potentially impacting battery efficiency during static content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped with capable camera systems, but approach image processing differently. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s computational photography expertise, delivering consistently excellent results in various lighting conditions. While specific sensor details for the Aquos R8s are unavailable, the Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing prioritizes dynamic range and detail. The absence of information regarding the R8s’ camera suggests it may rely more on hardware capabilities than software algorithms. Both phones offer photo and video recording, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s AI-powered features likely provide a more versatile and user-friendly experience.
Performance
The Aquos R8s’ Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant step up in processing power compared to the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon’s octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, promises faster CPU performance. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon also offers improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Tensor G2, while not matching the raw speed of the Snapdragon, excels in AI and machine learning tasks, powering features like Magic Eraser and Live Translate. The Pixel 7 Pro’s older Cortex-X1 cores and A78 cores are less efficient than the R8s’ newer A715 and A710 cores.
Battery Life
Both the Aquos R8s and Pixel 7 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the Pixel 7 Pro offers significantly faster charging at 23W wired (with 50% charge in 30 minutes), 23W wireless, and reverse wireless charging. The Aquos R8s is limited to 15W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor favoring the Pixel 7 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos R8s if you demand the absolute fastest Android performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you value a seamless software experience, exceptional camera capabilities powered by AI, and the convenience of fast wired and wireless charging.