The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we pit two compelling contenders against each other: the Sharp Aquos R5G, known for its unique design and premium features, and the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, a powerhouse offering incredible value. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges victorious.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X3 Pro delivers exceptional value with its Snapdragon 860 and impressive battery life. However, the Aquos R5G boasts a more premium build, potentially better camera capabilities (though specifics are limited), and a flagship Snapdragon 865. Ultimately, the Poco X3 Pro wins on price, while the Aquos R5G aims for a more premium experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, February | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~544 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 99.5 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.7, 52mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom, OIS
48 MP, f/2.9, 19mm (ultrawide), 0.8µm
TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3730 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glare Black, Aurora White | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | SH-51A, SHG01, SH-R50 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 700 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos R5G
- Premium Design & Build
- Flagship Snapdragon 865 Processor
- Potentially Superior Camera (speculative)
- 5G Connectivity
- Higher Price
- Limited Camera Specs Available
- Unknown Battery Life
- Availability may be limited
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Excellent Value for Money
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 Processor
- Long Battery Life (112h Endurance)
- Fast Charging (33W)
- Versatile Camera System
- Less Premium Build Quality
- May lack some flagship features
- Display may not be as color accurate as the Aquos R5G
Display Comparison
Both phones boast a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Aquos R5G likely has a higher resolution and potentially better color accuracy due to its premium positioning. The Poco X3 Pro's display is likely vibrant and sharp, but may not match the Aquos R5G's potential for color fidelity and sharpness.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for the Aquos R5G. The Poco X3 Pro offers a versatile camera system, likely capable of capturing good photos and videos. The Aquos R5G *potentially* has a better camera due to its higher price point and flagship status, but without specific specs, it's difficult to definitively say.
Performance
The Snapdragon 865 in the Aquos R5G is a flagship processor, generally offering slightly better overall performance than the Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro. However, the Poco X3 Pro's 860 is still incredibly powerful and handles demanding tasks with ease. Real-world performance differences may be minimal for most users.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 Pro shines here with an impressive endurance rating of 112h. The Aquos R5G's battery life is unknown, but given its premium features and potentially higher power consumption, it's unlikely to match the Poco X3 Pro's longevity.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Sharp Aquos R5G? Users prioritizing a premium design, potentially superior camera quality (despite limited info), and a flagship processor, and are willing to pay a premium. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro? Budget-conscious buyers seeking excellent performance, long battery life, and fast charging without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Sharp Aquos R5G worth the extra money?
It depends on your priorities. If you value a premium design, flagship processor, and potentially better camera, the Aquos R5G might be worth it. However, the Poco X3 Pro offers incredible value for the price.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
Both phones are capable of handling demanding games. The Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 provides excellent gaming performance, while the Aquos R5G's 865 offers a slight edge in raw power.
