Sharp Aquos R5G vs Sony Xperia 5 III: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sony Xperia 5 III edges out the Aquos R5G thanks to its superior camera capabilities, faster Snapdragon 888 chipset, and quicker charging. While the Aquos R5G boasts a remarkable display, the Xperia 5 III offers a more well-rounded flagship experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos R5G | Sony Xperia 5 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, February | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, October 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 157 x 68 x 8.2 mm (6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~544 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~449 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 99.5 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 86.9 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.7, 52mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.9, 19mm (ultrawide), 0.8µm TOF 3D (depth) | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | Wired, PD, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3730 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glare Black, Aurora White | Black, Green, Pink |
| Models | SH-51A, SHG01, SH-R50 | XQBQ62/G, XQBQ52G.UKCX, XQBQ52B.UKCX, XQ-BQ52, XQ-BQ72, XQ-BQ42, XQ-BQ62, SO-53B |
| Price | About 700 EUR | € 431.90 / £ 199.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 708394 (v9) GeekBench: 3549 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos R5G
- Exceptional IGZO Display
- Unique Japanese Features
- Bright and Vibrant Colors
- Solid Performance
- Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset than Xperia 5 III
- Camera Not as Strong as Xperia 5 III
- Availability Limited
Sony Xperia 5 III
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 Chipset
- Excellent Camera System
- Fast Charging (PD)
- 120Hz Refresh Rate Display
- Robust Build Quality
- Design Can Feel Dated
- Display Not as Bright as Aquos R5G
- Software Updates Can Be Slow
Display Comparison
The Sharp Aquos R5G's standout feature is its 6.5-inch IGZO display, known for its exceptional brightness and color accuracy. While the Xperia 5 III has a respectable 6.5-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, the Aquos R5G's panel offers a noticeably more vibrant and detailed visual experience. The Xperia 5 III's contrast ratio is technically 'infinite' (nominal), but the Aquos R5G's sheer brightness gives it an edge in outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Sony's expertise in camera technology shines in the Xperia 5 III. It features a versatile triple-lens setup with excellent image quality and video recording capabilities. The Aquos R5G's camera is competent, but it doesn't match the Xperia 5 III's overall performance, particularly in low-light conditions and video stabilization. The Xperia 5 III also offers more manual controls for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The Sony Xperia 5 III holds a clear advantage here. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset (5nm) is more powerful and efficient than the Aquos R5G's Snapdragon 865 (7nm). This translates to smoother performance in demanding games and applications, and potentially better battery life under heavy load. Both phones have ample RAM, but the 888's architecture provides a noticeable boost.
Battery Life
Both phones are reported to have excellent endurance, with an endurance rating of 100h. However, the Xperia 5 III's faster charging (PD) allows it to reach 50% capacity in just 30 minutes, a significant advantage over the Aquos R5G's charging speed.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos R5G is ideal for users who prioritize a top-tier display experience and are drawn to unique Japanese smartphone features. The Sony Xperia 5 III is a better choice for photography enthusiasts, gamers, and those seeking a reliable and powerful all-around flagship.