Sharp Aquos R5G vs Sony Xperia 5 II: A Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sony Xperia 5 II offers a more balanced package with its exceptional battery life, reliable camera, and compact design. While the Aquos R5G boasts a stunning display, its higher price and less refined software make the Xperia 5 II the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos R5G | Sony Xperia 5 II |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, February | 2020, September 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 158 x 68 x 8 mm (6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 163 g (5.75 oz) |
| IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~544 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~449 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 99.5 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 86.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision | OLED, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.7, 52mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.9, 19mm (ultrawide), 0.8µm TOF 3D (depth) | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.55", dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p, 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 21W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3730 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glare Black, Aurora White | Black, Grey, Blue, Pink |
| Models | SH-51A, SHG01, SH-R50 | SO-52A, XQ-AS52, XQ-AS62, XQ-AS72, A002SO, SOG02 |
| Price | About 700 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 695.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 239.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 532655 (v8) GeekBench: 3301 (v5.1) GFXBench: 41fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos R5G
- Unmatched IGZO display
- Fast 120Hz refresh rate
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Higher price
- Less refined software
- Battery life could be better
- Camera not as strong as Xperia 5 II
Sony Xperia 5 II
- Excellent camera system
- Long-lasting battery life
- Compact and ergonomic design
- Polished software experience
- Display not as bright as Aquos R5G
- Charging speed could be faster
- Design can feel a bit dated
Display Comparison
The Sharp Aquos R5G's standout feature is its 6.5-inch IGZO display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a remarkable 2520 x 1080 resolution. It's known for its brightness and color accuracy. The Xperia 5 II has a 6.1-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a 2520 x 1080 resolution. While excellent, it doesn't quite reach the Aquos R5G's peak brightness. The Xperia 5 II's contrast ratio is technically 'infinite' due to the OLED technology.
Camera Comparison
The Xperia 5 II excels in camera performance, offering a versatile triple-lens setup with excellent image quality and video recording capabilities. It's known for its accurate colors and reliable autofocus. The Aquos R5G's camera is capable, but doesn't quite match the Xperia 5 II's consistency and features. The Xperia 5 II also offers more manual controls for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G chipset and octa-core CPU, ensuring smooth performance for demanding tasks and gaming. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal, though software optimization could play a role. The Xperia 5 II's software feels more polished and responsive.
Battery Life
The Xperia 5 II boasts an impressive endurance rating of 102 hours, significantly outperforming the Aquos R5G (estimated around 70-80 hours based on similar Snapdragon 865 devices). The Xperia 5 II also supports 21W fast charging, while the Aquos R5G's charging speed is less well-documented.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Sharp Aquos R5G? Users prioritizing a truly exceptional display above all else, and willing to pay a premium for it. Who should buy the Sony Xperia 5 II? Users seeking a well-rounded flagship with a fantastic camera, long battery life, and a more compact form factor.