Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs. Samsung Galaxy S10e: A Detailed Comparison of Two Compact Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a well-rounded experience with wireless charging and a more established brand ecosystem, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is the better choice. However, the Aquos R2 Compact offers a compelling alternative for those seeking a slightly more raw performance profile and a potentially more unique user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos R2 compact | Samsung Galaxy S10e |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 12, 17, 19, 26, 28, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, November. Released 2019, January | 2019, February 20. Released 2019, March 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 131 x 64 x 9.3 mm (5.16 x 2.52 x 0.37 in) | 142.2 x 69.9 x 7.9 mm (5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 135 g (4.76 oz) | 150 g (5.29 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~485 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~438 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.2 inches, 67.5 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.8 inches, 82.8 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IGZO IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA/LATAMOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Exynos 9820 (8 nm) - EMEA/LATAMQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/China |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA/LATAM Adreno 640 - USA/China |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, Super Steady video |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 22.6 MP, f/1.9, 22 mm, PDAF, OIS | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@60fps (no EIS), 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 23 mm | 10 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (USA & Canada only) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | ANT+ Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD2.0 | 15W wired, PD2.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 2500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Smokey Green, Deep White, Pure Black | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Green, Prism Blue, Canary Yellow, Flamingo Pink |
| Models | SH-M09 | SM-G970F, SM-G970U, SM-G970W, SM-G9700, SM-G970U1, SM-G970N, SM-G970X |
| Price | - | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -89.4dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: infinite |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 71dB / Noise 76dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 325192 (v7), 389694 (v8) GeekBench: 10081 (v4.4), 2141 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos R2 compact
- Potentially better thermal management due to compact size.
- Snapdragon 845 offers strong performance.
- Unique and less common device.
- Lacks wireless charging.
- Limited availability and support.
- Less refined software experience.
Samsung Galaxy S10e
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging.
- More polished software experience.
- Wider availability and support.
- Exynos 9820 may be prone to thermal throttling.
- Potentially less efficient chipset.
- More mainstream design.
Display Comparison
Both devices boast an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent OLED panels. However, the context data lacks specific brightness figures. Given Samsung’s display expertise, the S10e likely achieves higher peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. The R2 Compact’s display size isn’t specified, but its ‘compact’ designation suggests a smaller screen, potentially impacting media consumption. The S10e’s display benefits from Samsung’s color calibration, offering a more accurate and vibrant viewing experience. The absence of refresh rate data for either device means neither can be definitively labeled as superior in terms of smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. The S10e’s camera system is generally regarded as more versatile and capable, benefiting from Samsung’s image processing algorithms. The R2 Compact’s camera performance is less well-documented, and its image quality likely lags behind the S10e. The lack of detail regarding sensor sizes and apertures makes a precise comparison impossible, but the S10e’s reputation suggests a more refined and consistent camera experience. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution auxiliary lenses on both devices, the primary sensor quality is the key differentiator.
Performance
The chipset battle pits Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 845 (10nm) in the R2 Compact against Samsung’s Exynos 9820 (8nm) – or Snapdragon 855 (7nm) depending on the region. The 8nm/7nm process node advantage of the Exynos/Snapdragon 855 suggests better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance. The Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores also represent an architectural improvement over the Kryo 385 in the 845. However, the R2 Compact’s smaller size may allow for more effective thermal dissipation, potentially mitigating the Exynos 9820’s known tendency to throttle under sustained load. The S10e’s RAM configuration isn’t specified, but it likely utilizes faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an Endurance Rating of 83h, indicating comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). The S10e offers a significant advantage with 15W wireless charging (Qi) and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the R2 Compact. While both support 18W/15W wired charging with PD2.0, the S10e’s wireless charging capabilities provide added convenience. The R2 Compact’s battery life is likely optimized through software and the efficiency of the Snapdragon 845, but the S10e’s wireless charging options offer a more flexible charging ecosystem.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact if you prioritize a potentially cooler-running Snapdragon 845 and are comfortable with importing a device and navigating a less mainstream software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S10e if you value wireless charging, a more refined software experience, broader compatibility with accessories, and the peace of mind of a globally supported brand.