Sharp Aquos R10 vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Performance, Battery, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw power and camera capabilities, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Sharp Aquos R10 provides a surprisingly competitive experience, particularly for those seeking efficient performance and faster charging cycles without the flagship price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos R10 | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156 x 75 x 8.9 mm (6.14 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED, 240Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1500 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 732 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50.3 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", PDAF | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50.3 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port 1.4 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 36W wired, PD3.0 | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cashmere White, Charcoal Black, Trench Beige | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | SH-51F, SH-M31 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | - | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos R10
- Faster charging (36W wired)
- Potentially more affordable price
- Efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset
- Less powerful processor than the 13 Pro
- Camera likely inferior to the 13 Pro
- Display brightness and features unknown
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Superior camera system
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Higher price point
- Slower wired charging than the R10 (though still very fast)
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1253 nits, which will provide superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Sharp Aquos R10 (brightness data unavailable). While the R10’s panel specifics are unknown, the 13 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality AMOLED panel. The absence of refresh rate data for the R10 means the 13 Pro likely offers a smoother visual experience, assuming it utilizes an adaptive refresh rate technology like LTPO. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for the R10, giving the 13 Pro an advantage based on Xiaomi’s reputation for display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro is expected to offer a far more sophisticated camera system. While specific sensor details are missing for the R10, the 13 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The 13 Pro’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) will provide sharper images and smoother video recording, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding lens apertures for the R10 makes a direct comparison difficult, but Xiaomi’s flagship typically excels in image quality and versatility.
Performance
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Aquos R10’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4nm). The 8 Gen 2 features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the R10’s 2.8 GHz Cortex-X4. This translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the architectural improvements in the 8 Gen 2 provide a clear performance advantage. The R10’s CPU configuration (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) is optimized for efficiency, but it won’t match the sustained performance of the 13 Pro’s (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510). RAM speed is not specified for either device, but the 13 Pro is likely to utilize faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s battery life is rated at an impressive 10:55h of active use and an endurance rating of 115h, demonstrating excellent efficiency. The Aquos R10’s battery capacity is unknown, but the 13 Pro’s larger battery combined with the efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a significant advantage. However, the R10 compensates with significantly faster charging: 36W wired vs the 13 Pro’s 120W wired (0-100% in 19 minutes). The 13 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging (0-100% in 36 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the R10. The R10’s PD3.0 support is shared with the 13 Pro, but the wattage difference is substantial.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos R10 if you need a phone that balances performance with efficiency, prioritizing quick charging and a smooth user experience for everyday tasks. It's ideal for users who don't demand the absolute best in mobile gaming or photography. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prefer uncompromising performance, a top-tier camera system, and are willing to pay a premium for the latest flagship features, including incredibly fast wired and wireless charging.