The Google Pixel 8 Pro represents the pinnacle of Google’s smartphone vision, boasting a custom Tensor G3 chip and advanced AI features. The Sharp Aquos R10, however, offers a compelling alternative, leveraging the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 to deliver flagship-adjacent performance at a potentially lower price point. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two 4nm-based devices, helping you determine which best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera capabilities, software support, and a refined user experience, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Sharp Aquos R10 presents a strong value proposition for those seeking solid performance and fast 36W charging without the premium Pixel price tag.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156 x 75 x 8.9 mm (6.14 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED, 240Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1500 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 732 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50.3 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", PDAF | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50.3 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 36W wired, PD3.0 | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min
23W wireless
Reverse wireless
Bypass charging |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cashmere White, Charcoal Black, Trench Beige | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | SH-51F, SH-M31 | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | - | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
Sharp Aquos R10
- Faster 36W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 offers strong performance
- Lacks wireless charging
- Camera likely inferior to Pixel 8 Pro
- Software support may be limited
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Superior camera system with AI features
- Long-term software support from Google
- Brighter display with LTPO technology
- Higher price point
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Tensor G3 may not match Snapdragon in raw CPU power
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1600 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Aquos R10’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Pixel 8 Pro’s LTPO panel allows for variable refresh rates, optimizing battery life, a feature likely absent on the Aquos R10. Color accuracy is expected to be superior on the Pixel 8 Pro, given Google’s display calibration expertise.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess. While specific sensor details are not provided, Google’s image processing algorithms and features like Magic Eraser and Best Take are significant advantages. The Aquos R10’s camera specifications are unknown, but it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 8 Pro’s capabilities in dynamic range, low-light performance, and video stabilization. The Pixel 8 Pro’s focus on both photo and video quality sets it apart.
Performance
Both devices utilize a 4nm process, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Google Tensor G3 employs a nona-core configuration with a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, geared towards AI tasks. The Aquos R10’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 features an octa-core setup with a Cortex-X4 at 2.8 GHz, prioritizing sustained CPU performance. The Snapdragon’s architecture, with its Cortex-A720 cores, may offer a slight edge in multi-threaded workloads. The Pixel 8 Pro benefits from Google’s software optimization, but the Aquos R10’s Snapdragon is a proven performer. RAM specifications are missing for the Aquos R10, but the Pixel 8 Pro likely uses faster LPDDR5x RAM.
Battery Life
The Pixel 8 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 11:14h of active use and an endurance rating of 90 hours. It supports 30W wired charging with PD3.0, PPS, and 50% charge in 30 minutes, alongside 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. The Aquos R10 offers 36W wired charging with PD3.0, potentially providing faster charging speeds, but lacks wireless charging capabilities. The Pixel 8 Pro’s larger battery and optimized power management likely offset the Aquos R10’s faster wired charging in real-world scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos R10 if you need a phone with fast wired charging (36W) and prioritize raw performance for the price, potentially benefiting from the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s efficiency. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prefer a best-in-class camera system, long-term software updates, and the unique AI-powered features exclusive to the Pixel ecosystem, even if it means a higher upfront cost and slightly slower wired charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the Aquos R10 handle demanding games like Genshin Impact smoothly?
The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is a capable chipset and should handle Genshin Impact at medium to high settings. However, sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling, especially compared to flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 devices. The Pixel 8 Pro’s Tensor G3, while optimized for AI, may offer similar gaming performance, but with a different focus on graphical fidelity versus sustained frame rates.
❓ How does the Pixel 8 Pro’s software update commitment compare to the Aquos R10?
Google guarantees at least 7 years of software updates for the Pixel 8 Pro, including security patches and OS upgrades. Sharp’s update policy for the Aquos R10 is likely to be shorter, typically around 2-3 years of OS updates and 3-4 years of security patches. This difference is a significant factor for users who prioritize long-term software support and security.
❓ Is the 36W charging on the Aquos R10 significantly faster than the 30W charging on the Pixel 8 Pro in real-world use?
While the Aquos R10 has a slightly higher charging wattage, the Pixel 8 Pro utilizes PPS (Programmable Power Supply) which optimizes charging efficiency. In practice, the difference in 0-100% charge times may be minimal, with both phones likely taking around 60-75 minutes. The Pixel 8 Pro also offers the convenience of wireless charging, which the Aquos R10 lacks.
