Sharp Aquos C10 vs. Aquos wish: A Deep Dive into Performance and 5G Connectivity

Sharp's Aquos line offers compelling value in the budget smartphone space. The C10, with its established Snapdragon 630, represents a more mature design, while the wish introduces 5G connectivity via the Snapdragon 480. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, helping you determine which best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing 5G connectivity and future-proofing, the Sharp Aquos wish is the clear winner. While the Snapdragon 630 in the C10 is still capable, the Snapdragon 480's 8nm process and 5G modem offer a more modern experience, despite a slight CPU clock speed difference. The wish is the better long-term investment.

PHONES
Phone Names Sharp Aquos C10 Sharp Aquos wish
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 201, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41
5G bands-1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2018, July. Released 2018, July2022, January 19
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2022, January 21
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum framePlastic body, plastic frame
Dimensions141.8 x 72 x 7.9 mm (5.58 x 2.83 x 0.31 in)147 x 71 x 8.9 mm (5.79 x 2.80 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight140 g (4.94 oz)162 g (5.71 oz)
 -IPX5/IP6X/IPX7 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)-
Resolution1080 x 2040 pixels, 17:9 ratio (~420 ppi density)720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density)
Size5.5 inches, 80.7 cm2 (~79.0% screen-to-body ratio)5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
ChipsetQualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm)Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)
GPUAdreno 508Adreno 619
OSAndroid 8.0 (Oreo), Sharp UIAndroid 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC
Internal64GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.2", 1.4µm-
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDRLED flash
Single-13 MP, (wide), AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features1080p@30fps-
Single8 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.2", 1.4µm8 MP
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer
Battery
Charging18W wired-
TypeLi-Ion 2700 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 3730 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlackSpring Bud Green, Foggy Black
PriceAbout 400 EURAbout 230 EUR
SAR EU0.35 W/kg (head)-

Sharp Aquos C10

  • Potentially lower price point due to age.
  • Reliable Snapdragon 630 chipset for basic tasks.
  • Established software support (potentially).

  • Older chipset with less efficient 14nm process.
  • Lacks 5G connectivity.
  • Potentially larger bezels and lower peak brightness.

Sharp Aquos wish

  • 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.
  • More efficient Snapdragon 480 (8nm process).
  • Likely better image processing capabilities.

  • May be slightly more expensive.
  • Snapdragon 480 is an entry-level 5G chipset.
  • Software support may be less mature.

Display Comparison

Neither Sharp provides detailed display specifications beyond size and resolution. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The C10's age suggests a potentially lower peak brightness and wider bezels compared to the wish. Color accuracy is likely similar, leaning towards standard smartphone calibration. The lack of high refresh rates is expected in this segment.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specs are unavailable. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth or macro sensors. The image processing capabilities will be a key differentiator. The newer ISP within the Snapdragon 480 of the wish likely provides better noise reduction and dynamic range compared to the C10's older ISP. Without specific sensor details, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the wish has a technological advantage.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Aquos C10's Snapdragon 630 (14nm) features an octa-core CPU with a split configuration of 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Aquos wish utilizes the Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm), with 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460 cores. The 8nm process of the 480 offers significantly improved power efficiency, translating to better battery life and less thermal throttling under sustained load. While the C10's peak clock speeds are slightly higher, the architectural improvements and process node of the 480 give it an edge in real-world performance, especially in graphics-intensive tasks. The 5G modem in the wish is a major differentiator.

Battery Life

Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Snapdragon 480's 8nm process in the wish contributes to better power efficiency. The C10 supports 18W wired charging, while the wish's charging speed is unknown but likely similar. The wish's efficiency advantage will likely result in longer screen-on time despite potentially having a similar or slightly smaller battery capacity. The 18W charging on the C10 will provide a reasonable, but not exceptionally fast, charging experience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Sharp Aquos C10 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for basic tasks and aren't concerned with 5G. It's ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize stability over cutting-edge features. Buy the Sharp Aquos wish if you want 5G connectivity for faster download speeds and a more future-proof device, even if it means a slightly less established chipset. This is the better choice for streaming, mobile gaming, and users who anticipate needing 5G in the near future.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 480 in the Aquos wish handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 480 is an entry-level 5G chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, expect to play at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It's not designed for high-end gaming experiences, but it's sufficient for casual gaming.
❓ Does the Aquos wish's 5G connectivity work with all carriers?
The Aquos wish supports specific 5G bands. Compatibility will depend on your carrier and region. Check your carrier's website to confirm if the Aquos wish is compatible with their 5G network before purchasing.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed between the Snapdragon 630 and 480 significant in real-world use?
While the Snapdragon 630 has slightly higher peak clock speeds, the Snapdragon 480's architectural improvements and 8nm process node provide a more noticeable performance boost in everyday tasks and sustained workloads. The clock speed difference is less important than the overall efficiency and architecture.
❓ How does the power efficiency of the Snapdragon 480 impact daily usage on the Aquos wish?
The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480 translates to significantly lower power consumption compared to the 14nm Snapdragon 630. This means you'll likely experience longer battery life on the Aquos wish, even with similar usage patterns, allowing for more screen-on time and less frequent charging.