Samsung Z105 vs. Google Pixel Fold: A Detailed Comparison of Foldable Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing software experience and camera versatility, the Google Pixel Fold emerges as the stronger choice. The Tensor G2 chipset, while not the absolute performance leader, delivers a smooth and intelligent experience, complemented by Google’s renowned computational photography. The Z105, lacking detailed specs, relies on brand reputation, but needs to offer significant advancements to justify consideration.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Z105 | Google Pixel Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | UMTS 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | Yes, 384 kbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / UMTS | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2004, Q1 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 95 x 50 x 26 mm (3.74 x 1.97 x 1.02 in) | Unfolded: 139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 mmFolded: 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 132 g (4.66 oz) | 283 g (9.98 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 176 x 192 pixels, 7 lines | 1840 x 2208 pixels (~378 ppi density) |
| Size | - | 7.6 inches, 183.3 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | Foldable OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Second external TFT display (96 x 64 pixels), 65K colors Four way navigation keys | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.8 inches, 1080 x 2092 pixels, 17.4:9 ratio, 408 ppi 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | - | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Call records | 10 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | - | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, contact groups, Photo call | - |
| 3 MB for images 3 x 35 sec voice memo | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | VGA, 180 deg. rotating lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.25µm |
| Video | No | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Cover camera: 9.5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | - | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| No | - | |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic ringtones | - |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | No | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | - | Yes |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | Proprietary | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | - |
| Games | 3 - Ultimate Golf Challenge, Fun2Link and Alpha Wing | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, EMS, MMS, EMail | - |
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SyncML Video telephony / video streaming Predictive text input Organizer Nokia Smart Messaging | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | Wired, PD3.0 Wireless |
| Stand-by | Up to 314 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 4 h 10 min | - |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1000 mAh battery | Li-Po 4821 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Metallic Silver | Porcelain, Obsidian |
| Models | - | G9FPL |
| Price | - | € 670.87 / $ 389.26 / £ 899.99 |
| SAR EU | 0.74 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Z105
- Potential for S Pen support (based on Samsung’s Z Fold history)
- Likely refined hinge mechanism and durability
- Strong integration with the Samsung ecosystem
- Unknown chipset performance and thermal management
- Lack of detailed specifications hinders accurate assessment
- Potential for software bloat compared to Pixel Fold
Google Pixel Fold
- Google Tensor G2 delivers excellent AI and machine learning capabilities
- Exceptional camera performance with Google’s computational photography
- Clean Android experience with timely updates
- Tensor G2 may not match the raw performance of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Battery life could be a concern with a power-hungry foldable display
- Outer display is narrower than some competitors
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel Fold features an inner foldable display, and given Samsung’s history, the Z105 will likely employ a similar Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel with LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates. However, without Z105 specs, we can only speculate on resolution and peak brightness. The Pixel Fold’s display is known for its relatively narrow bezels, contributing to a more immersive experience. Samsung typically excels in color accuracy, so the Z105 could potentially offer a more calibrated display, but the Pixel Fold’s brightness levels are competitive. The aspect ratio of the outer display is a key differentiator; the Pixel Fold’s wider outer screen is more usable as a standard smartphone.
Camera Comparison
The Google Pixel Fold leverages Google’s computational photography prowess, delivering exceptional image quality even in challenging lighting conditions. While specific sensor sizes aren’t available for the Z105, Samsung typically employs high-resolution sensors. The Pixel Fold’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The Z105 will likely offer a versatile camera system, but the Pixel Fold’s software optimizations give it a significant edge. The Pixel Fold’s camera benefits from the Tensor G2’s dedicated image signal processor (ISP), enabling features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. We can expect the Z105 to have a strong zoom capability, a hallmark of Samsung’s flagship phones.
Performance
The Google Pixel Fold is powered by the Google Tensor G2 (5nm), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with Cortex-X1, A78, and A55 cores. This chipset prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. The Z105’s chipset remains unknown, but given Samsung’s strategy, it will likely utilize either a Snapdragon or Exynos processor. The Tensor G2’s 5nm node is a known quantity, offering a balance between performance and efficiency. Without Z105 specs, it’s difficult to assess its thermal management, but Samsung has historically faced challenges with Exynos chipsets overheating under sustained load. The Pixel Fold’s LPDDR5X RAM ensures fast data access, complementing the Tensor G2’s processing power.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel Fold supports both wired (PD3.0) and wireless charging, offering convenient power-up options. The battery capacity of the Pixel Fold is 4821 mAh. The Z105’s battery capacity and charging speeds are currently unknown. Given the power demands of foldable displays, battery life is a critical consideration. The Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 chipset, while not the most power-efficient, is optimized for intelligent power management. The Z105 will need to offer comparable or superior battery life and charging speeds to compete effectively. Samsung’s history suggests a focus on fast charging technologies, but the actual implementation remains to be seen.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Z105 if you need a device deeply integrated with the Samsung ecosystem, potentially prioritizing S Pen functionality (based on past Z Fold models) and a potentially more refined hinge mechanism. Buy the Google Pixel Fold if you prefer a clean Android experience, exceptional camera performance driven by Google’s AI, and a more compact, pocketable foldable form factor.