Samsung Star II vs. LG Cookie: A Throwback Phone Showdown

Remember the days of affordable, feature-packed phones? The Samsung Star II and LG Cookie were popular choices back then. Let's revisit these devices and see how they stack up against each other in a modern context, focusing on what made them appealing.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Star II edges out the LG Cookie thanks to its slightly better camera and more readily available information. While both are relics of the past, the Star II's photo capabilities and wider availability of reviews give it a slight advantage for those seeking a nostalgic experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung S5260 Star II LG KP500 Cookie
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
EDGEYesClass 10
GPRSClass 12Class 10
TechnologyGSMGSM
Launch
Announced2011, January. Released 2011, February2008, September. Released 2008, December
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions107.5 x 54 x 12.4 mm (4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 in)106.5 x 55.4 x 11.9 mm (4.19 x 2.18 x 0.47 in)
SIMMini-SIMMini-SIM
Weight94 g (3.32 oz)89 g (3.14 oz)
Display
Resolution240 x 400 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~155 ppi density)240 x 400 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~155 ppi density)
Size3.0 inches, 25.6 cm2 (~44.1% screen-to-body ratio)3.0 inches, 25.6 cm2 (~43.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT, 256K colorsTFT resistive touchscreen, 256K colors
 TouchWiz UI 3.0Flash UI Handwriting recognition
Memory
Call records30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls40 dialed, 40 received, 40 missed calls
Card slotmicroSDHC (dedicated slot)microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal30MB48MB
PhonebookYes, Photocall1000 entries, Photocall
Main Camera
Single3.15 MP3.15 MP
Video320p@15fps320p@12fps
Selfie camera
 NoNo
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth3.0, A2DP2.1, A2DP
PositioningNoNo
RadioStereo FM radio, RDSStereo FM radio, RDS
USBmicroUSB 2.02.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nNo
Features
BrowserWAP 2.0/xHTML, HTMLWAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML
GamesYes + downloadable4 + downloadable
JavaYes, MIDP 2.0Yes, MIDP 2.0
MessagingSMS, MMS, Email, IMSMS, EMS, MMS, Email
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer
 Facebook, Twitter Gtalk, AIM, Facebook chat, Yahoo IM MP3/WAV/WMA/AAC+ player H.264/MP4 player Organizer Document viewer (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF) Voice memo Predictive text inputMP3/WMA/AAC player MP4/H.263 player Organizer Document viewer (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF) Voice memo Predictive text input
Battery
Stand-byUp to 900 hUp to 350 h
Talk timeUp to 8 h 20 minUp to 3 h 30 min
TypeRemovable Li-Ion 1000 mAh batteryRemovable Li-Ion 900 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsBlack, WhiteBlack, Vandyke brown, Anodizing silver, Elegant gold, Delicious white, Pink
PriceAbout 70 EURAbout 60 EUR
SAR0.68 W/kg (head)     0.63 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU0.96 W/kg (head)-
Tests
Audio quality Noise -85.6dB / Crosstalk -61.2dB Noise -87.5dB / Crosstalk -63.0dB
Camera Photo-
Loudspeaker Voice 68dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 70dB Voice 78dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 82dB

Samsung S5260 Star II

  • Better Camera (3.0MP)
  • More readily available information/reviews
  • Slightly brighter display (likely)
  • Classic design

  • Outdated technology
  • Slow performance
  • Limited app support

LG KP500 Cookie

  • Ultra-budget option
  • Compact size
  • Simple to use

  • Poor camera quality (likely 1.3-2.0MP)
  • Limited information/support
  • Very slow performance
  • Outdated technology

Display Comparison

Both the Samsung Star II and LG Cookie featured relatively small, standard-definition displays typical of their era. The Star II likely had a slightly brighter screen, but both offered adequate visibility for basic tasks like texting and browsing simple websites. Expect limited resolution and color accuracy by today's standards.

Camera Comparison

The Samsung Star II boasted a 3.0MP camera, allowing for decent photo quality for the time. The LG Cookie's camera specs are less clear, but it was likely a 1.3MP or 2.0MP camera, resulting in noticeably lower image quality. The Star II's camera was a key selling point.

Performance

Performance was never a strong suit of either phone. Both ran on older processors and had limited RAM, making multitasking and demanding apps a struggle. Expect slow loading times and occasional lag. They were designed for calls, texts, and basic web browsing.

Battery Life

Battery life was generally good on both devices, as they lacked power-hungry features like high-resolution displays and powerful processors. Expect a full day of moderate use from either phone.

Buying Guide

Who should buy the Samsung Star II? Those seeking a simple, reliable phone with a decent camera for basic photography. Who should buy the LG Cookie? Primarily collectors or those seeking a very basic, ultra-budget option, understanding that information and support will be limited.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Are these phones still usable in 2024?
Yes, but with significant limitations. They won't support modern apps or network technologies. They are best suited for collectors or as very basic phones for calls and texts in areas with limited connectivity.
❓ Where can I find replacement parts or accessories?
Finding replacement parts or accessories will be extremely difficult. Online marketplaces like eBay might offer some options, but availability is limited.