Looking for an affordable Samsung phone? The M580 Replenish and Dart T499 were both budget-friendly options, but they offer different features and performance. This comparison dives deep into their specs and capabilities to help you decide which one is the better choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Dart T499 edges out the Replenish thanks to its more modern Mediatek chipset (28nm vs. older Qualcomm). While both have similar CPU speeds, the Dart's chipset generally offers better efficiency and potentially slightly improved performance. Both are very basic phones, however.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | CDMA 800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | CDMA2000 1x | HSDPA 1700 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 2, 4, 5, 7, 17 |
| Speed | EV-DO Rev.0, 153.2 Kbps | HSPA 7.2/0.384 Mbps |
| Technology | CDMA / CDMA2000 | GSM / HSPA |
| | - | HSDPA 2100 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, April. Released 2011, May 08 | 2011, May. Released 2011, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 123 x 60 x 11 mm (4.84 x 2.36 x 0.43 in) | 104 x 61 x 13 mm (4.09 x 2.40 x 0.51 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | - |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 116 g (4.09 oz) | 108 g (3.81 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~127 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~32.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 3.14 inches, 30.5 cm2 (~48.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | TFT, 256K colors |
| | - | TouchWiz UI
|
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM7627-2 | Mediatek MT6735M (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720MP2 |
| OS | Android 2.2 (Froyo), upgradable to 2.3 (Gingerbread) | Android 2.2 (Froyo) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included |
| Internal | 512MB 256MB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 2 MP | 3.2 MP |
| Video | Yes | 320p@15fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | - | 1.3 MP |
| | No | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | 3.0, A2DP |
| NFC | - | No |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | - | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, hotspot (charges may apply) | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | HTML | - |
| Sensors | - | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | Made partially by recycled bio-plastics
MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/eAAC+ player
Organizer
Document viewer
Voice memo
Predictive text input | MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/eAAC+ player
Organizer
Photo/video editor
Document viewer
Voice memo/dial
Predictive text input (Swype) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 217 h | Up to 288 h |
| Talk time | Up to 5 h 40 min | Up to 4 h |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1160 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 1200 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Raspberry Pink | Gray |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | 0.54 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 0.91 W/kg (head) 1.12 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) |
Samsung M580 Replenish
- Very affordable
- Simple and easy to use
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Outdated chipset
- Low performance
- Poor camera quality
- Low-resolution display
Samsung Dart T499
- More modern chipset (MT6735M)
- Potentially better battery life
- Slightly improved performance
- Affordable
- Still limited performance
- Low-resolution display
- Basic camera quality
- Limited storage
Display Comparison
Both phones feature relatively small, low-resolution displays (likely around 3.5-4 inches). Expect basic LCD panels with limited viewing angles and color accuracy. The Dart might have a slightly newer display technology, but the difference would be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality on both phones is expected to be quite basic, likely with 2-3MP rear cameras. Image quality will be limited in low light, and video recording capabilities will be rudimentary. Expect grainy photos and limited features.
Performance
While both have 600 MHz CPUs, the Dart's Mediatek MT6735M chipset (28nm) is significantly more efficient and modern than the Replenish's Qualcomm MSM7627-2. This translates to potentially smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times on the Dart. However, don't expect high-end performance from either device.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is likely around 1500-2000 mAh for both devices. The Dart's more efficient chipset *could* provide slightly better battery life, but usage patterns will heavily influence actual performance. Expect a day of light use at best.
Buying Guide
The Samsung M580 Replenish is best for users needing a very basic phone for calls, texts, and minimal app usage. The Samsung Dart T499 is a slightly better choice for those who want a bit more responsiveness and potentially slightly better battery life, though still limited.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones still worth buying?
Given their age, finding these phones new is unlikely. If you find them used and at a very low price, the Dart T499 is the slightly better option. However, newer budget smartphones offer significantly better performance and features.
❓ What operating system did these phones run?
Both phones originally shipped with Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) or 4.2 (Jelly Bean). Updates were limited, and they likely run outdated versions now.
