The smartwatch market has seen numerous contenders, but the Samsung Gear S2 Classic 3G and the Samsung Acclaim represent different eras and approaches. This comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall value to help you decide which wearable best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Gear S2 Classic 3G is the clear winner due to its established specs, 3G connectivity, and Tizen OS. The Acclaim's lack of detailed specifications makes it difficult to recommend, suggesting it was a less prominent or older model. The Gear S2 offers a more complete and supported experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | CDMA 800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | EV-DO Rev.0, 153.2 Kbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | CDMA / EVDO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2016, February. Released 2016, April | 2010, June. Released 2010, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), stainless steel frame | - |
| Dimensions | 44 x 46.9 x 13.4 mm (1.73 x 1.85 x 0.53 in) | 114 x 59 x 15 mm (4.49 x 2.32 x 0.59 in) |
| Keyboard | - | QWERTY |
| SIM | eSIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 54 g (1.90 oz) | 130 g (4.59 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
Compatible with standard 20mm straps | Optical trackpad |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 360 x 360 pixels (~424 ppi density) | 320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~180 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.2 inches | 3.2 inches, 30.5 cm2 (~45.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | TFT, 256K colors |
| | Always-on display
Rotating bezel | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | - |
| Chipset | Exynos 3250 Dual | - |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | - |
| OS | Tizen OS 2.3.2 | Android 2.1 (Eclair), upgradable to 2.2 (Froyo) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 4 GB included |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | - | 3.15 MP, AF |
| Video | - | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 2.1, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | - |
| Positioning | No | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/e | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, hotspot (Android 2.2) |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | HTML |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer | Accelerometer |
| | S-Voice natural language commands and dictation
MP3/M4A/AAC/WAV player
Photo viewer
Voice memo/dial/commands
Samsung Pay | MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/eAAC+ player
Organizer
Document viewer
Voice memo
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wireless (Qi) | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 48 h (3G) | Up to 450 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 8 h |
| Type | Li-Ion 300 mAh, non-removable | Removable Li-Ion 1500 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Rose Gold, ceramic bracelet | Blue |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Gear S2 classic 3G
- Stylish design with rotating bezel
- 3G connectivity for calls and data
- Vibrant Super AMOLED display
- Tizen OS with app support
- Wireless charging (Qi)
- Older processor can feel slow at times
- Camera quality is basic
- Limited app ecosystem compared to Wear OS
Samsung Acclaim
- Potentially budget-friendly if found
- Simple and straightforward interface (assumed)
- Lack of detailed specifications
- Likely outdated hardware
- Unknown features and functionality
- Limited or no app support
- Uncertain battery life
Display Comparison
The Gear S2 Classic 3G boasts a vibrant 1.2-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its excellent color reproduction and sharpness. The Acclaim's display details are unavailable, but based on its era, it likely used a less advanced LCD panel with lower resolution and brightness. The Gear S2's display is significantly superior.
Camera Comparison
The Gear S2 Classic 3G features a 2MP camera, sufficient for quick snapshots. The Acclaim's camera capabilities are unknown. The Gear S2 offers a basic camera functionality, while the Acclaim may lack one entirely.
Performance
The Gear S2 Classic 3G's Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 processor and Exynos 3250 chipset provide adequate performance for its Tizen OS, handling apps and notifications smoothly. The Acclaim's performance is unknown, but given its likely older hardware, it's probable that it would feel sluggish compared to the Gear S2.
Battery Life
The Gear S2 Classic 3G offers a decent battery life, typically lasting a day with moderate use. The Acclaim's battery life is unknown, but older smartwatches often had shorter battery lives. The Gear S2 likely has better battery endurance.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Gear S2 Classic 3G is ideal for users seeking a stylish, feature-rich smartwatch with 3G connectivity for calls and data without a phone. The Samsung Acclaim is difficult to recommend without more information; it might appeal to collectors or those seeking a very basic, potentially budget-friendly option if found.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Samsung Gear S2 Classic 3G still worth buying?
Yes, if you appreciate its classic design, 3G connectivity, and Tizen OS. However, be aware that it's an older device with limited app support compared to newer smartwatches.
❓ What operating system does the Samsung Acclaim use?
Unfortunately, specific details about the Samsung Acclaim's operating system are unavailable. It likely used a proprietary OS or an early version of Android.
