The foldable market is maturing, offering choices beyond just novelty. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold aims for uncompromising performance with the latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Motorola Razr+ 2025 prioritizes all-day usability and convenience with a focus on battery optimization and wireless charging. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which foldable best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding peak performance and willing to trade some battery life, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 offers a significant processing advantage. However, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 excels in battery endurance and offers convenient wireless charging, making it ideal for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded thickness: 4.2 mm Folded thickness: 14 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2232 x 3184 pixels (~389 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.0 inches, 303.2 cm2 | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP (ultrawide)
third unspecified camera | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps (gyro-EIS), 10-bit HDR, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Yes | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 45W wired
15W wireless
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5600 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | - | XT2451-1 |
| Price | - | $ 500.00 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Unmatched processing power with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Likely superior camera system based on Samsung's track record
- Potential for higher display quality (brightness, color accuracy)
- Potentially shorter battery life due to the power-hungry chipset
- Likely higher price point
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Excellent battery life (10:12h active use)
- Convenient wireless and reverse wired charging
- More efficient chipset for everyday tasks
- Lower processing power compared to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Display Comparison
While both devices are foldables, the provided data doesn't detail display specs. However, given Samsung's history, the Z TriFold likely features a higher peak brightness and potentially a more color-accurate panel. The Razr+ 2025, focusing on efficiency, may prioritize power-saving display technologies. The absence of refresh rate data is notable; Samsung typically leads in this area, offering adaptive refresh rates for smoother visuals.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications. However, given Samsung’s camera prowess, the Z TriFold is expected to have a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. Motorola has improved its camera offerings, but typically lags behind Samsung in this area. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement, but the Z TriFold is likely to offer superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold’s Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) with its Oryon V3 Phoenix cores represents a significant leap in mobile processing. The octa-core configuration, with 2x4.6 GHz performance cores, promises substantially faster CPU performance compared to the Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm). The 8s Gen 3, while capable, is a step down, utilizing Cortex-X4 and A720 cores clocked at lower frequencies. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 also implies superior power efficiency *at peak load*, despite potentially higher overall power draw. This translates to better sustained performance during intensive tasks and potentially less thermal throttling. The Z TriFold will likely dominate in benchmarks and graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 shines in battery performance, achieving a 10:12 hour active use score. While the Z TriFold’s battery capacity is unknown, the more powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is likely to consume more power. Both devices support 45W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. However, the Razr+ 2025 adds 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wired charging, offering greater versatility. The Razr+ 2025’s battery life advantage is a significant benefit for users who prioritize all-day usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold if you are a power user who frequently engages in demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously. You prioritize raw speed and responsiveness above all else. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you value all-day battery life, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and prefer a more balanced experience focused on everyday usability rather than pushing performance limits.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Razr+ 2025 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a capable chipset, it won't deliver the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the Z TriFold. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a smooth frame rate in demanding titles like Genshin Impact, but it should still be playable.
❓ How much faster is the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 compared to the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in real-world usage?
The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 offers a significant performance advantage, estimated to be around 20-30% faster in CPU-intensive tasks and 15-25% faster in GPU benchmarks. This translates to snappier app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience.
❓ Does the Motorola Razr+ 2025 support fast charging protocols beyond 45W?
The provided data only confirms 45W wired charging. While Motorola may support some level of Power Delivery (PD) or Quick Charge (QC), it's not explicitly stated. The inclusion of 15W wireless charging is a key differentiator, however.
❓ Is the 5W reverse wired charging on the Razr+ 2025 useful for charging accessories like earbuds?
Yes, the 5W reverse wired charging is convenient for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch. While it's not a fast charging solution, it can provide a small boost when you're away from a power outlet.
