Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: Folding Phone Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a more established software experience, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and faster charging significantly outperform the Z Fold3's older Snapdragon 888, despite the Z Fold3's slightly longer endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 11 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 27 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 158.2 x 128.1 x 6.4 mmFolded: 158.2 x 67.1 x 14.4-16 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 271 g (9.56 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus support | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1768 x 2208 pixels (~374 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.6 inches, 179.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 6.2 inches, 832 x 2268 pixels, 25:9 ratio | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 11, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, 12mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 4 MP, f/1.8, 2.0µm, under display Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 11W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Phantom Silver, Phantom Green, Thom Browne Edition, Wooyoungmi Edition | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | SM-F926B, SM-F926B/DS, SM-F926U, SM-F926U1, SM-F926W, SM-F9260, SM-F926N | XT2451-1 |
| Price | € 453.57 / $ 367.74 / £ 449.99 | $ 500.00 |
| SAR | 0.73 W/kg (head) 1.22 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.04 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 75h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 635918 (v8), 752218 (v9) GeekBench: 12719 (v4.4), 3239 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
- Larger unfolded display for tablet-like experience
- Established software ecosystem and support
- Proven UTG display technology
- Older Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Slower 25W charging
- Lower thermal efficiency
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Modern Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Faster 45W wired charging
- More compact and pocketable design
- Shorter battery endurance rating (though active use is strong)
- Less established foldable software experience
- Limited camera specification details
Display Comparison
The Galaxy Z Fold3 boasts a larger overall display real estate, but the Razr+ 2025 focuses on a more compact external screen and a refined internal folding display. While the Z Fold3 achieves a measured peak brightness of 922 nits, the Razr+ 2025’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. However, Motorola typically prioritizes color accuracy and viewing angles in its flagship devices. The Z Fold3’s UTG (Ultra Thin Glass) is a proven technology, but the Razr+ 2025 likely benefits from advancements in foldable display durability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited for the Z Fold3 beyond 'Photo / Video'. The Razr+ 2025’s camera details are also sparse. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a definitive camera comparison is challenging. However, Motorola has been improving its computational photography algorithms, potentially offering a competitive edge in image processing. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone prioritizes camera performance as a primary selling point.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant leap over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3’s SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The 4nm process node of the 8s Gen 3 offers superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during demanding tasks. The Razr+ 2025’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz alongside Cortex-A720 and A520 cores – provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Z Fold3’s Cortex-X1, A78, and A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 has an endurance rating of 75 hours, indicating respectable battery life for its age. The Motorola Razr+ 2025, however, boasts a more focused active use score of 10:12 hours. While not directly comparable, the Razr+ 2025’s 45W wired charging is significantly faster than the Z Fold3’s 25W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Razr+ 2025 also offers 15W wireless charging compared to the Z Fold3’s 11W, further enhancing convenience. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s efficiency also contributes to better battery management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G if you need a larger, more tablet-like unfolded experience and value the established ecosystem of Samsung software and accessories. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you prefer a more pocketable, clamshell-style foldable with a modern chipset, faster charging, and a focus on streamlined usability.