Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: Which Foldable Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 emerges as the better choice. Its newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset delivers improved efficiency and performance, coupled with significantly faster 45W charging. While the Z Fold2 boasts a longer endurance rating, the Razr+'s active use score and modern architecture provide a more compelling overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - SM-F916B | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - SM-F916B | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 Sub6 - SM-F916B | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-F916U1 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 05 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, September 18 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back, aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 159.2 x 128.2 x 6.9 mmFolded: 159.2 x 68 x 13.8-16.8 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 282 g (9.95 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1768 x 2208 pixels (~373 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.6 inches, 180.8 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 6.23 inches, 816 x 2260 pixels, 25:9 ratio | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.09 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1.1 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, 12mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 11W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Bronze, Mystic Black, Thom Browne Edition, Aston Martin Racing Edition | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | SM-F916B, SM-F916U, SM-F916U1, SM-F916N, SM-F9160, SM-F916W, SCG05 | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 960 EUR | $ 500.00 |
| SAR EU | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 81h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 564907 (v8) GeekBench: 12607 (v4.4), 2715 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
- Larger unfolded display for immersive content consumption
- Proven reliability and software support (though aging)
- Strong endurance rating (81h)
- Older Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Slower 25W charging
- Larger and heavier form factor
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- More efficient Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Faster 45W wired charging
- More compact and pocketable design
- Smaller unfolded display
- Potentially less refined software experience (Motorola)
- Battery life dependent on active use patterns
Display Comparison
The Galaxy Z Fold2 5G achieves a measured peak brightness of 714 nits, a respectable figure, but the Razr+ 2025’s display specifications are not provided. Given Motorola’s recent focus on display quality, we can anticipate a comparable or potentially brighter panel. The Z Fold2’s larger unfolded display is its key advantage, offering a more tablet-like experience. However, the Razr+’s external display is likely more practical for quick interactions. Without knowing the Razr+'s panel technology (LTPO or not), it's difficult to assess power efficiency, but the newer chipset suggests better overall display management.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with simply 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific sensor details. However, given the Razr+ 2025’s positioning as a modern flagship, it’s reasonable to expect a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and improved image processing. The Z Fold2’s camera, while capable, is showing its age. Without detailed specifications, it’s impossible to definitively declare a winner, but the Razr+ likely benefits from newer computational photography techniques and potentially better low-light performance. We can assume the Razr+ will have a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant leap in efficiency over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G’s Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7nm+). The 4nm process node allows for higher transistor density and reduced power consumption, translating to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling. The Razr+'s CPU configuration – Cortex-X4, A720, and A520 cores – is architecturally superior to the Z Fold2’s A77 and A55 cores, promising faster application loading and smoother multitasking. While the Z Fold2’s 865 was a flagship chip in its time, the 8s Gen 3 offers a noticeable performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G boasts an endurance rating of 81 hours, a strong result for its time. However, the Motorola Razr+ 2025’s active use score of 10:12 hours provides a more practical measure of real-world battery life. The Razr+ also features significantly faster charging at 45W wired, compared to the Z Fold2’s 25W, drastically reducing charge times. While the Z Fold2’s larger battery capacity *might* offer slightly longer screen-on time in specific scenarios, the Razr+’s efficiency and faster charging make it the more convenient option for daily use. The Razr+'s 15W wireless charging also surpasses the Z Fold2's 11W.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G if you prioritize a proven track record and a larger, more immersive unfolded display experience, and are willing to accept slower charging and an older chipset. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you value modern performance, faster charging speeds, and a more compact, pocketable design, even if it means sacrificing some of the Z Fold2’s screen real estate.