Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: A Deep Dive into the Latest Flip Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and proven software support, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is the stronger choice. Its impressive 37:03h endurance and 1700 charge cycles outweigh the Razr 50 Ultra’s faster charging, especially considering the Exynos 2400’s robust performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 09 | 2024, June 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 25 | Available. Released 2024, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mmFolded: 85.1 x 71.9 x 14.9 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + multiple eSIM (max 2 at a time) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 1 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~426 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 101.5 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired, QC2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse |
| Models | SM-F761B, SM-F761B/DS, SM-F761U1, SM-F761U | XT2451-3 |
| Price | € 763.35 / $ 599.99 / £ 699.00 / ₹ 89,999 | € 629.28 / £ 699.54 / ₹ 56,635 |
| SAR | 0.84 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.84 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 37:03h endurance, 1700 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (210 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
- Exceptional battery life (37:03h endurance)
- Robust 1700 charge cycle lifespan
- Brighter display (1444 nits)
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Exynos 2400 may throttle under sustained load
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Faster charging (45W wired)
- Potentially more efficient Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Sleek and modern design
- Lower battery endurance (12:05h active use)
- Dimmer display (1265 nits)
Display Comparison
Both the Z Flip7 FE and Razr 50 Ultra feature foldable OLED displays, but differ in brightness and potentially panel technology. The Z Flip7 FE boasts a measured peak brightness of 1444 nits, significantly outshining the Razr 50 Ultra’s 1265 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While neither spec sheet explicitly mentions LTPO, Samsung’s history with foldable displays suggests the Flip7 FE likely incorporates this technology for variable refresh rate and power efficiency. The difference in brightness is substantial enough to favor the Samsung for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Neither device’s specifications highlight a standout camera system. Both likely rely on competent but not class-leading sensors. Without detailed sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The focus should be on image processing algorithms. Motorola historically leans towards more saturated, vibrant images, while Samsung often aims for more natural color reproduction. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither phone will significantly outperform the other in photography, making this a less critical differentiating factor.
Performance
The core performance difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Z Flip7 FE utilizes the Exynos 2400, a 10-core processor built on a 4nm process, while the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra features the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, also on a 4nm node. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s octa-core configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) is architecturally more streamlined than the Exynos 2400’s (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4, 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720, 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520). While the Exynos has more cores, the Snapdragon’s higher clock speed on its prime core and more efficient core arrangement may lead to better sustained performance and thermal management. However, the Exynos’s sheer processing power will likely excel in heavily multi-threaded tasks.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key battleground. The Z Flip7 FE demonstrates a remarkable 37:03h endurance and a lifespan of 1700 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. In active use, it lasts 10:09h. The Razr 50 Ultra, while offering a respectable 12:05h of active use, falls short of the Flip7 FE’s overall endurance. The Razr 50 Ultra compensates with faster charging – 45W wired versus the Flip7 FE’s 25W. While 45W can get you to 50% charge in a similar timeframe (around 30 minutes), the Flip7 FE’s superior overall endurance means you’ll need to charge it less frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE if you need exceptional battery life, a well-established software ecosystem, and a proven track record of foldable durability. You’ll benefit from longer usage between charges and a more refined user experience. Buy the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you prioritize faster charging speeds, a slightly more efficient processor for sustained tasks, and a potentially more eye-catching design, accepting a trade-off in overall battery endurance.