Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs Oppo Find N2 Flip: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find N2 Flip edges out the Z Flip4 with its brighter display, faster charging, and slightly better battery life. However, Samsung's established software and ecosystem remain strong draws. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: Oppo for raw power and features, Samsung for familiarity and brand recognition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 | Oppo Find N2 Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (6CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 10 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 25 | Available. Released 2022, December 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), plastic back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm Folded: 84.9 x 71.9 x 15.9-17.1 mm | Unfolded: 166.2 x 75.2 x 7.5 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.2 x 16 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~426 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 101.5 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.9 inches, 260 x 512 pixels (Gorilla Glass Victus+) | Cover display: AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5 3.26 inches, 382 x 720 pixels, 250 PPI 800 nits (HBM), 900 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, dual proximity, compass |
| Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3700 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Bora Purple, Graphite, Pink Gold, Blue, Yellow, White, Navy, Khaki, Red | Astral Black, Moonlit Purple, Gold |
| Models | SM-F721B, SM-F721B/DS, SM-F721N, SM-F721U, SM-F721U1, SM-F721W, SM-F7210 | CPH2437, PGT110 |
| Price | $ 214.99 / C$ 334.00 / £ 219.00 / € 284.00 / ₹ 40,999 | About 490 EUR |
| SAR | 1.02 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 92h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 685754 (v8) | 800001 (v9) GeekBench: 3913 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 773574 (v9) GeekBench: 3265 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
- Established Samsung ecosystem
- Refined software experience
- Durable hinge design
- Water resistance (IPX8)
- Shorter battery life
- Slower charging speeds
- Higher price point
Oppo Find N2 Flip
- Brighter display
- Faster charging
- Longer battery life
- Larger cover screen
- Competitive price
- Less established software ecosystem
- Potential software update delays
- Availability may be limited in some regions
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N2 Flip boasts a significantly brighter display at 1039 nits compared to the Z Flip4's 919 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Oppo's increased brightness will be noticeable in outdoor conditions. The cover screen size and functionality also differ, with Oppo offering a larger and more versatile cover screen.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area of comparison. While both offer capable camera systems, detailed comparisons require more in-depth testing. Initial impressions suggest the Find N2 Flip may offer slightly improved image processing and low-light performance. Both phones offer video recording capabilities, but quality and features may vary.
Performance
Both phones are powered by high-end chipsets – the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Z Flip4 and the Dimensity 9000+ in the Find N2 Flip. While both offer flagship-level performance, the Dimensity 9000+ generally benchmarks slightly higher, suggesting a potential edge in demanding tasks and gaming. However, real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal for most users.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N2 Flip takes a clear lead in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 97 hours compared to the Z Flip4's 75 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage times between charges. The Find N2 Flip also features faster 44W wired charging, reaching 50% in just 23 minutes, while the Z Flip4's 25W charging takes 30 minutes.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4? Users deeply embedded in the Samsung ecosystem, those prioritizing a refined software experience, and those who appreciate Samsung's brand recognition. Who should buy the Oppo Find N2 Flip? Users seeking a brighter display, faster charging speeds, and a more competitive price point, particularly those comfortable with a potentially less mature software ecosystem.