Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: Which Flip Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a proven track record, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers a significant performance leap and superior power efficiency, coupled with substantially faster 45W charging, making it a more future-proof choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat16 1000/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 11 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, February 14 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 167.3 x 73.6 x 7.2 mm Folded: 87.4 x 73.6 x 17.3 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2636 pixels (~425 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 101.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.95 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.41 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1.1 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Wireless | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Mirror Purple, Mirror Gold, Thom Browne Edition | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | SM-F700, SM-F700F, SM-F700F/DS, SM-F700U/DS, SM-F700U1/DS, SM-F700N, M-F7000, SM-F700W/DS, SM-F700U1 | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 770 EUR | $ 500.00 |
| SAR | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.55 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
- Established brand reputation in foldables
- Potentially more compact form factor (unconfirmed)
- Wide availability and accessory ecosystem
- Older Snapdragon 855+ chipset
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Likely shorter battery life
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Impressive 10:12 hour active use battery life
- 45W wired charging for rapid replenishment
- Newer device, potential software bugs
- Less established brand in the foldable space
- Long-term durability remains unproven
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip’s display peaks at 596 nits, a respectable brightness for indoor use, but the Razr+ 2025’s display specifications are missing. Given Motorola’s recent focus on display quality, we anticipate a comparable or potentially higher peak brightness. Both devices likely utilize OLED panels for vibrant colors, but the absence of refresh rate data for the Razr+ 2025 leaves a key question unanswered. The Z Flip’s foldable nature introduces a crease, a common trait in this form factor, while the Razr+ 2025’s hinge design and crease visibility remain unknown.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are largely absent for both devices beyond the core chipsets. Given the Z Flip’s market positioning, it likely features a competent but not class-leading camera system. The Razr+ 2025, aiming for a premium experience, may incorporate larger sensors and improved image processing. Without detailed sensor size, aperture, and OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the newer ISP within the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 should provide enhanced image quality and computational photography capabilities for the Razr+ 2025.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 boasts the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm), a substantial upgrade over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm). The 8s Gen 3’s 4nm process offers significantly improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The CPU architecture also represents a leap forward: the Razr+ 2025 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside A720 and A520 cores, compared to the Z Flip’s older Kryo 485 configuration. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Z Flip’s 855+ is showing its age, and will struggle with demanding modern applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 shines in battery performance, achieving a 10:12 hour active use score. This is a significant advantage over the Z Flip, which lacks published battery life data but is known to have a smaller capacity. The Razr+ 2025 also supports 45W wired charging, allowing for a much faster 0-100% charge compared to the Z Flip’s 15W wired charging. The inclusion of 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wired charging on the Razr+ 2025 further enhances its versatility, features absent on the Z Flip.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip if you prioritize brand recognition, a more compact form factor (though data is missing to confirm this), and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you value cutting-edge performance, extended battery life as evidenced by the 10:12 active use score, and significantly faster charging speeds, making it ideal for power users and those who demand the latest technology.