Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs. Galaxy A53 5G: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The XCover6 Pro excels in durability and usability with gloves, making it ideal for demanding professions. The A53 5G offers a superior display, potentially better camera performance, and a more refined overall experience for everyday users. It's a trade-off between toughness and polish.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 29 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 79.9 x 9.9 mm (6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~77.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, charging connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/mc/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| Samsung DeX support | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired (USA) 15W wired (International) | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4050 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | SM-G736U, SM-G736U1, SM-G736B, SM-G736B/DS | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | $ 155.92 / C$ 329.97 / £ 249.00 / € 199.99 | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.48 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
- Rugged and durable design
- Glove-friendly operation
- Push-to-Talk (PTT) support
- Water and dust resistant (IP68)
- Slightly better raw performance
- Less vibrant display
- Potentially higher operating temperatures
- Slower charging (US version)
- Less refined design
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Potentially better camera quality
- Sleeker design
- Excellent battery life
- More versatile camera features
- Less durable than XCover6 Pro
- No glove-friendly operation
- No PTT support
- Exynos chipset performance can vary
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (830 nits measured) with a near-infinite contrast ratio, offering a more immersive viewing experience. The XCover6 Pro's display is functional but lacks the same vibrancy and color accuracy. While both have FHD+ resolution, the A53 5G's panel is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
While both offer capable camera systems, the A53 5G likely has an edge in overall image quality, especially in well-lit conditions. The XCover6 Pro's camera is decent but doesn't match the A53 5G's versatility and processing capabilities. Low-light performance is likely better on the A53 5G.
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G 5G in the XCover6 Pro generally provides slightly better raw performance than the Exynos 1280 in the A53 5G, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. However, both phones offer smooth performance for everyday use and moderate gaming. Thermal management might be a factor with the XCover6 Pro due to its rugged design.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the A53 5G achieving an endurance rating of 113 hours. The XCover6 Pro's battery capacity is slightly smaller, but its efficiency allows for comparable longevity. Charging speeds are similar, though the US version of the XCover6 Pro has a slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the XCover6 Pro if you need a phone that can withstand drops, water, and dust, and if you frequently work in challenging environments or need glove-friendly operation. Buy the A53 5G if you prioritize a vibrant display, a more versatile camera system, and a sleeker design for general use.