Samsung Galaxy Watch8 vs. Galaxy Watch6: A Detailed Comparison of Samsung's Smartwatch Lineup

Samsung's Galaxy Watch series continues to refine the Wear OS experience. The Galaxy Watch8 arrives as a direct successor to the Watch6, boasting a new chipset and subtle refinements. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two smartwatches, focusing on how the advancements in the Watch8 translate to real-world benefits for users.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 represents a worthwhile upgrade, primarily due to its significantly more efficient Exynos W1000 chipset fabricated on a 3nm process. This translates to improved performance and potentially longer battery life. However, the Watch6 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Samsung Galaxy Watch6
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 40, 66, 711, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 40, 66, 71
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2025, July 092023, July 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, July 25Available. Released 2023, August 11
Body
BuildGlass front (Sapphire crystal), aluminum frameGlass front (Sapphire crystal), aluminum frame
Dimensions46 x 43.7 x 8.6 mm (1.81 x 1.72 x 0.34 in)42.8 x 44.4 x 9 mm (1.69 x 1.75 x 0.35 in)
SIMeSIMeSIM
Weight34 g (44mm), 30 g (40mm) (1.06 oz)33.3 g (44mm), 28.7 g (40mm) (1.02 oz)
Display
ProtectionSapphire crystalSapphire crystal
Resolution480 x 480 pixels (~327 ppi density)480 x 480 pixels (~327 ppi density)
Size1.47 inches1.5 inches
TypeSuper AMOLED, 3000 nits (peak)Super AMOLED, 2000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUPenta-coreDual-core 1.4GHz Cortex-A55
ChipsetExynos W1000 (3 nm)Exynos W930 (5 nm)
GPUMali-G68Mali-G68
OSAndroid Wear OS 6, One UI 8 WatchAndroid Wear OS 4, upgradable to 6.0, One UI Watch 8
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal32GB 2GB RAM16GB 2GB RAM
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBNoNo
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, altimeter, compass, SpO2, temperature (skin), BioActive, antioxidant indexAccelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, altimeter, compass, SpO2, temperature (skin)
Battery
Charging10W wireless10W wireless
TypeLi-Ion 435 mAhLi-Ion 425 mAh
Misc
ColorsGraphite, SilverGraphite, Silver, Gold
ModelsSM-L320, SM-L325, SM-L330, SM-L335, SM-L325U, SM-L335U-
Price$ 229.98 / C$ 1,649.98 / € 237.69About 190 EUR
SAR EU0.15 W/kg (head)     0.78 W/kg (body)-

Samsung Galaxy Watch8

  • Significantly more efficient Exynos W1000 (3nm)
  • Potentially longer battery life
  • Improved performance and responsiveness

  • Likely higher price point
  • May not offer a dramatically different experience for basic users

Samsung Galaxy Watch6

  • More affordable price
  • Capable performance for everyday tasks
  • Proven Wear OS experience

  • Less efficient Exynos W930 (5nm)
  • Potentially shorter battery life
  • May struggle with demanding applications

Display Comparison

Both watches share a similar form factor and display technology, but detailed specs are missing. Given Samsung's history, both likely utilize Super AMOLED panels with excellent color accuracy. The key difference will likely be in peak brightness and potentially a slightly refined LTPO implementation in the Watch8, allowing for more granular refresh rate control and improved power efficiency. Without specific nit ratings, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Watch8's newer chipset could enable more aggressive power management of the display.

Camera Comparison

Neither watch is particularly known for its camera capabilities, and detailed camera specs are unavailable. It's safe to assume both feature basic front-facing cameras for video calls. Any differences in image quality will likely be minimal and driven by software processing rather than hardware improvements. This isn't a key buying factor for either device.

Performance

The core differentiator lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy Watch8's Exynos W1000, built on a 3nm process, is a substantial leap forward compared to the Watch6's Exynos W930 (5nm). This smaller node allows for significantly higher transistor density and improved power efficiency. While the Watch6's dual-core 1.4GHz Cortex-A55 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Watch8's penta-core architecture promises smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved responsiveness, particularly with Wear OS's increasingly complex features. The 3nm process also implies better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use.

Battery Life

Both watches feature 10W wireless charging, indicating similar charging speeds. However, the Exynos W1000's 3nm process in the Watch8 is the critical factor here. A more efficient chipset translates directly to lower power consumption, potentially extending battery life even with a similar battery capacity (specs missing). While 0-100% charge times will likely be comparable, the Watch8 should offer more usable time between charges, especially for users who frequently utilize power-intensive features like GPS tracking or always-on display.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 if you prioritize peak performance, future-proofing with the latest chipset technology, and potentially longer battery life during demanding tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch6 if you're seeking a capable smartwatch experience at a lower price point and don't require the absolute latest in processing power. The Watch6 is ideal for users focused on fitness tracking and basic notifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos W1000 chip in the Watch8 generate excessive heat during prolonged use, like GPS tracking or video recording?
The 3nm fabrication process of the Exynos W1000 is designed to improve thermal efficiency. While any processor will generate heat under heavy load, the smaller node size and optimized architecture should result in less throttling and more consistent performance compared to the 5nm Exynos W930 in the Watch6.
❓ How much of a real-world battery life improvement can I expect with the Galaxy Watch8 compared to the Watch6?
The exact battery life improvement will depend on usage patterns. However, due to the 3nm process, the Watch8 could potentially offer 10-20% longer battery life during typical use, and a more significant improvement during power-intensive tasks like GPS tracking or always-on display usage. This is an estimate, as battery capacity specs are missing.
❓ Is the performance difference between the penta-core W1000 and the dual-core W930 noticeable for everyday tasks like checking notifications and using basic apps?
For basic tasks, the performance difference may be subtle. However, the Watch8's more powerful processor will become more apparent when multitasking, launching apps, or using more demanding features like voice assistants or complex watch faces. The W1000 provides headroom for future software updates and more complex Wear OS features.